JANWX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Research Fund (JANWX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
JANWX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Feb 24, 2005. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
JANWX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JANWX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANWX Janus Henderson Global Research Fund | -5.16% | 20.79% | 23.54% | 26.78% | -19.56% | 17.84% | 20.20% | 28.89% | -6.88% | 26.87% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANWX achieves a -5.16% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, JANWX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
JANWX
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -6.01%
- YTD
- -5.16%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- 15.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JANWX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANWX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JANWX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
JANWX
FGIAX
JANWX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Research Fund (JANWX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JANWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 1.79 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 2.30 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.36 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 2.73 | -1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 12.62 | -6.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.79 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.80 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.58 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.42 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between JANWX and FGIAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JANWX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
JANWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, less than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANWX Janus Henderson Global Research Fund | 8.53% | 8.09% | 8.33% | 4.90% | 4.56% | 11.67% | 3.75% | 4.84% | 6.93% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.81% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
JANWX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANWX drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANWX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -49.35% | +14.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -8.29% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -21.08% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.78% | -38.02% | +3.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.03% | -3.06% | -4.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -7.22% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 1.79% | +0.88% |
Volatility
JANWX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Global Research Fund (JANWX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that JANWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JANWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 4.15% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 7.07% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.60% | 12.28% | +5.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 13.08% | +4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 15.17% | +2.80% |