PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANRX vs. JNGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANRX vs. JNGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Select Fund (JANRX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANRX achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly higher than JNGLX's 0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, JANRX has outperformed JNGLX with an annualized return of 13.67%, while JNGLX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.16% annualized return.


JANRX

1D
1.33%
1M
2.05%
YTD
10.54%
6M
10.94%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
13.67%

JNGLX

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.05%
1Y
31.21%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
11.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANRX vs. JNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JANRX
Janus Henderson Global Select Fund
10.54%19.49%17.21%17.41%-9.94%15.96%16.14%27.43%-9.80%31.08%
JNGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund
0.58%24.84%3.60%7.51%-2.69%6.78%25.66%29.20%4.17%22.13%

Correlation

The correlation between JANRX and JNGLX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2000

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between JANRX and JNGLX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANRX vs. JNGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANRX
JANRX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
JANRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
JANRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

JNGLX
JNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
JNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANRX vs. JNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Select Fund (JANRX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANRXJNGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.19

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.85

10.17

-0.33

JANRX vs. JNGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the JNGLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANRX and JNGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANRX vs. JNGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANRX drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than JNGLX's maximum drawdown of -59.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANRX and JNGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANRXJNGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.94%

-59.00%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-9.68%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-21.17%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.48%

-22.21%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.17%

-27.37%

-11.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.44%

+2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.76%

-17.62%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

3.03%

-0.81%

Volatility

JANRX vs. JNGLX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Global Select Fund (JANRX) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX) at 5.38%. This indicates that JANRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANRXJNGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

5.38%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

11.25%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

15.13%

-2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

15.91%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

17.40%

+0.62%

JANRX vs. JNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANRX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than JNGLX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANRX vs. JNGLX - Dividend Comparison

JANRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%, more than JNGLX's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JANRX
Janus Henderson Global Select Fund
9.68%10.71%10.44%8.62%2.81%13.04%5.11%4.37%17.07%0.86%1.14%1.08%
JNGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund
4.54%4.56%5.84%4.26%0.25%9.85%7.80%6.23%13.32%0.89%0.30%8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


JANRX and JNGLX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JANRX has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to JNGLX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANRX dropped -63.94% vs JNGLX's -59.00%.

JNGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANRX and JNGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer