PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNGLX vs. JANBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNGLX vs. JANBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX) and Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNGLX achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than JANBX's 3.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JNGLX having a 10.58% annualized return and JANBX not far behind at 10.35%.


JNGLX

1D
-1.40%
1M
1.67%
YTD
-1.00%
6M
1.37%
1Y
28.89%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.58%

JANBX

1D
0.30%
1M
2.80%
YTD
3.93%
6M
4.03%
1Y
15.59%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNGLX vs. JANBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund
-1.00%24.84%3.60%7.51%-2.69%6.78%25.66%29.20%4.17%22.13%
JANBX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund
3.93%14.99%15.36%15.38%-16.60%17.22%14.34%22.53%0.64%17.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JNGLX and JANBX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between JNGLX and JANBX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNGLX vs. JANBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNGLX
JNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
JNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

JANBX
JANBX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JANBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JANBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNGLX vs. JANBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX) and Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNGLXJANBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

1.84

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.03

2.63

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

1.97

+1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.20

8.52

+1.67

JNGLX vs. JANBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the JANBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNGLX and JANBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNGLXJANBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.84

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.72

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.93

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.68

-0.11

Drawdowns

JNGLX vs. JANBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNGLX drawdown since its inception was -59.00%, which is greater than JANBX's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNGLX and JANBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNGLXJANBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.00%

-31.70%

-27.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-8.13%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.17%

-11.91%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.21%

-21.52%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

-22.49%

-4.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.98%

0.00%

-3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.65%

-6.64%

-11.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.88%

+1.11%

Volatility

JNGLX vs. JANBX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) at 2.46%. This indicates that JNGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JANBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNGLXJANBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

2.46%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

6.91%

+3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

8.71%

+5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

11.19%

+4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

11.16%

+6.20%

JNGLX vs. JANBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNGLX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than JANBX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNGLX vs. JANBX - Dividend Comparison

JNGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, less than JANBX's 8.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JANBX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund
8.50%8.78%6.96%2.25%1.95%4.50%2.49%2.85%7.06%4.65%2.55%5.81%
JNGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund
4.61%4.56%5.84%4.26%0.25%9.85%7.80%6.23%13.32%0.89%0.30%8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNGLX and JANBX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNGLX has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to JANBX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNGLX dropped -59.00% vs JANBX's -31.70%.

JNGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNGLX and JANBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer