JANBX vs. JAFLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) and Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX).
JANBX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Aug 31, 1992. JAFLX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 13, 1993.
Performance
JANBX vs. JAFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JANBX vs. JAFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANBX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund | -5.36% | 14.99% | 15.36% | 15.38% | -16.60% | 17.22% | 14.34% | 22.53% | 0.64% | 17.78% |
JAFLX Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio | -0.20% | 7.41% | 1.96% | 5.52% | -13.64% | -0.89% | 10.48% | 9.57% | -1.00% | 3.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANBX achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly lower than JAFLX's -0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, JANBX has outperformed JAFLX with an annualized return of 9.37%, while JAFLX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.09% annualized return.
JANBX
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -4.89%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- -4.13%
- 1Y
- 10.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
JAFLX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JANBX vs. JAFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANBX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than JAFLX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JANBX vs. JAFLX — Risk / Return Rank
JANBX
JAFLX
JANBX vs. JAFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) and Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JANBX | JAFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.05 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.48 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.57 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.58 | 4.90 | +0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANBX | JAFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.05 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.06 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.43 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.04 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between JANBX and JAFLX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JANBX vs. JAFLX - Dividend Comparison
JANBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than JAFLX's 5.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANBX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund | 8.80% | 8.78% | 6.96% | 2.25% | 1.95% | 4.50% | 2.49% | 2.85% | 7.06% | 4.65% | 2.55% | 5.81% |
JAFLX Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio | 5.35% | 5.34% | 5.09% | 4.27% | 4.75% | 4.84% | 2.87% | 3.31% | 3.21% | 2.98% | 2.92% | 2.90% |
Drawdowns
JANBX vs. JAFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANBX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, which is greater than JAFLX's maximum drawdown of -18.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANBX and JAFLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANBX | JAFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -18.06% | -13.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.13% | -2.87% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.52% | -18.06% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.49% | -18.06% | -4.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.68% | -1.98% | -4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -2.12% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 0.92% | +1.12% |
Volatility
JANBX vs. JAFLX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX) at 1.60%. This indicates that JANBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JANBX | JAFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 1.60% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.65% | 2.44% | +4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 4.23% | +7.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.16% | 6.03% | +5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 4.92% | +6.20% |