JANBX vs. JNGLX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JANBX (Janus Henderson Balanced Fund) and JNGLX (Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund) are both mutual funds - JANBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Janus Henderson, while JNGLX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Janus Henderson. Over the past 10 years, JANBX returned 10.35%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for JNGLX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANBX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for JNGLX.

Performance

JANBX vs. JNGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANBX achieves a 3.93% return, which is significantly higher than JNGLX's -1.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JANBX having a 10.35% annualized return and JNGLX not far ahead at 10.58%.

JANBX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 3.93%
• 6M: 4.03%
• 1Y: 15.59%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: 8.00%
• 10Y*: 10.35%

JNGLX

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: -1.00%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 28.89%
• 3Y*: 10.29%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: 10.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANBX vs. JNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JANBX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund	3.93%	14.99%	15.36%	15.38%	-16.60%	17.22%	14.34%	22.53%	0.64%	17.78%
JNGLX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund	-1.00%	24.84%	3.60%	7.51%	-2.69%	6.78%	25.66%	29.20%	4.17%	22.13%

Correlation

The correlation between JANBX and JNGLX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between JANBX and JNGLX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

JANBX vs. JNGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANBX

JANBX Risk / Return Rank: 36
JANBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
JANBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
JANBX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
JANBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
JANBX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

JNGLX

JNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 52
JNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
JNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
JNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
JNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
JNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANBX vs. JNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JANBX	JNGLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.07	-0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.03	-0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.36	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	3.15	-1.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.52	10.20	-1.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JANBX vs. JNGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the JNGLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANBX and JNGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JANBX	JNGLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	2.07	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.48	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93	0.61	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.57	+0.11

Drawdowns

JANBX vs. JNGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANBX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum JNGLX drawdown of -59.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANBX and JNGLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANBX	JNGLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.70%	-59.00%	+27.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.13%	-9.68%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.91%	-21.17%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.52%	-22.21%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.49%	-27.37%	+4.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.98%	+3.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.64%	-17.65%	+11.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	2.99%	-1.11%

Volatility

JANBX vs. JNGLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) is 2.46%, while Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that JANBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANBX	JNGLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	3.89%	-1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.91%	10.62%	-3.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.71%	14.63%	-5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.19%	15.81%	-4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.16%	17.36%	-6.20%

JANBX vs. JNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANBX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than JNGLX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANBX vs. JNGLX - Dividend Comparison

JANBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than JNGLX's 4.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JANBX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund	8.50%	8.78%	6.96%	2.25%	1.95%	4.50%	2.49%	2.85%	7.06%	4.65%	2.55%	5.81%
JNGLX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund	4.61%	4.56%	5.84%	4.26%	0.25%	9.85%	7.80%	6.23%	13.32%	0.89%	0.30%	8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANBX and JNGLX in my portfolio?

JANBX and JNGLX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANBX or JNGLX?

JNGLX has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to JANBX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANBX dropped -31.70% vs JNGLX's -59.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JNGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.