JAFLX vs. AMFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX).
JAFLX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 13, 1993. AMFIX is managed by AAMA. It was launched on Jun 30, 2017.
Performance
JAFLX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JAFLX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAFLX Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio | -0.50% | 7.41% | 1.96% | 5.52% | -13.64% | -0.89% | 10.48% | 9.57% | -1.00% | -0.01% |
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund | 0.21% | 3.74% | 3.48% | 3.84% | -6.26% | -1.37% | 2.24% | 2.47% | 0.89% | -0.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAFLX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than AMFIX's 0.21% return.
JAFLX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
AMFIX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JAFLX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAFLX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JAFLX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank
JAFLX
AMFIX
JAFLX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAFLX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 3.05 | -2.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 4.95 | -3.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.69 | -0.51 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 4.18 | -2.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 21.12 | -15.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAFLX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 3.05 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.34 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.56 | +0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between JAFLX and AMFIX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JAFLX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison
JAFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than AMFIX's 2.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAFLX Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio | 5.36% | 5.34% | 5.09% | 4.27% | 4.75% | 4.84% | 2.87% | 3.31% | 3.21% | 2.98% | 2.92% | 2.90% |
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund | 2.22% | 2.08% | 2.44% | 1.70% | 0.83% | 0.57% | 0.83% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JAFLX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAFLX drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAFLX and AMFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAFLX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -9.35% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -0.74% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.06% | -8.91% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -0.49% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -2.06% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 0.15% | +0.76% |
Volatility
JAFLX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.48%. This indicates that JAFLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JAFLX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 0.48% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.43% | 0.72% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23% | 0.98% | +3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 2.16% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 1.75% | +3.17% |