JANBX vs. CBALX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JANBX (Janus Henderson Balanced Fund) and CBALX (Columbia Balanced Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, JANBX returned 10.55%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for CBALX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JANBX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for CBALX.

Performance

JANBX vs. CBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) and Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANBX achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than CBALX's 5.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JANBX having a 10.55% annualized return and CBALX not far behind at 10.22%.

JANBX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 3.49%
• 6M: 3.00%
• 1Y: 13.70%
• 3Y*: 13.70%
• 5Y*: 7.60%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

CBALX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 5.48%
• 6M: 5.08%
• 1Y: 16.33%
• 3Y*: 14.46%
• 5Y*: 8.06%
• 10Y*: 10.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANBX vs. CBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JANBX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund	3.49%	14.99%	15.36%	15.38%	-16.60%	17.22%	14.34%	22.53%	0.64%	17.78%
CBALX Columbia Balanced Fund	5.48%	14.14%	14.60%	21.49%	-16.63%	14.92%	17.91%	23.05%	-5.75%	14.29%

Correlation

The correlation between JANBX and CBALX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996	0.93

The correlation between JANBX and CBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JANBX vs. CBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANBX

JANBX Risk / Return Rank: 33
JANBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
JANBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
JANBX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JANBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
JANBX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

CBALX

CBALX Risk / Return Rank: 51
CBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANBX vs. CBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) and Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JANBX	CBALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.94	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.73	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.36	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	2.58	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	10.75	-3.17

JANBX vs. CBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the CBALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANBX and CBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JANBX vs. CBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANBX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum CBALX drawdown of -34.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANBX and CBALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANBX	CBALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.70%	-34.53%	+2.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.13%	-6.63%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.91%	-12.06%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.52%	-20.91%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.49%	-22.73%	+0.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-1.26%	+0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.63%	-5.30%	-1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	1.59%	+0.31%

Volatility

JANBX vs. CBALX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) and Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) have volatilities of 3.51% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANBX	CBALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	3.69%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.53%	7.10%	+0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.20%	8.81%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.27%	11.17%	+0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.20%	11.39%	-0.19%

JANBX vs. CBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANBX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CBALX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANBX vs. CBALX - Dividend Comparison

JANBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, more than CBALX's 6.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBALX Columbia Balanced Fund	6.22%	6.42%	7.83%	1.84%	5.36%	9.26%	5.31%	4.16%	5.82%	2.79%	1.60%	4.05%
JANBX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund	8.53%	8.78%	6.96%	2.25%	1.95%	4.50%	2.49%	2.85%	7.06%	4.65%	2.55%	5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANBX and CBALX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, JANBX and CBALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JANBX or CBALX?

CBALX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to JANBX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANBX dropped -31.70% vs CBALX's -34.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.