PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAMRX vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAMRX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAMRX achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, JAMRX has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 16.11%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.52% annualized return.


JAMRX

1D
1.26%
1M
-2.02%
6M
3.68%
YTD
2.38%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
16.11%
ALL TIME*
12.41%

VUG

1D
2.21%
1M
1.85%
6M
8.45%
YTD
7.33%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
17.52%
ALL TIME*
12.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$562.97M$645.16M$657.53M

JAMRX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAMRX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
2.38%18.32%41.65%43.02%-30.03%20.08%32.67%35.28%-2.84%25.89%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
7.33%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between JAMRX and VUG is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.97

The correlation between JAMRX and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAMRX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAMRX
JAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
JAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
JAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAMRX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAMRXVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.18

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

1.09

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

3.45

-2.13

JAMRX vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAMRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAMRX and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAMRX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAMRX drawdown since its inception was -71.20%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAMRX and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAMRXVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.20%

-50.68%

-20.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.09%

-16.53%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

-22.85%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.53%

-35.61%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.53%

-35.61%

-0.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

-3.45%

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.56%

-7.08%

-14.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

5.20%

+0.17%

Volatility

JAMRX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.95%. This indicates that JAMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAMRXVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

5.95%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

14.38%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

17.76%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.53%

22.52%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.54%

21.57%

-0.03%

JAMRX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAMRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAMRX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

JAMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.70%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAMRX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
11.70%11.98%10.22%2.88%0.28%13.02%2.91%10.27%10.92%8.17%5.60%9.61%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, JAMRX and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JAMRX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to VUG (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAMRX dropped -71.20% vs VUG's -50.68%.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAMRX and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer