PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAMRX vs. ANFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAMRX vs. ANFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAMRX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than ANFFX's 22.83% return. Over the past 10 years, JAMRX has outperformed ANFFX with an annualized return of 17.26%, while ANFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.32% annualized return.


JAMRX

1D
1.31%
1M
7.77%
YTD
9.45%
6M
8.62%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
28.36%
5Y*
15.73%
10Y*
17.26%

ANFFX

1D
0.67%
1M
11.90%
YTD
22.83%
6M
25.77%
1Y
55.61%
3Y*
30.63%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
16.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAMRX vs. ANFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAMRX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
9.45%18.32%41.65%43.02%-30.03%20.08%32.67%35.28%-2.84%25.89%
ANFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1
22.83%30.96%23.52%29.10%-29.69%11.98%33.43%26.38%-4.41%34.27%

Correlation

The correlation between JAMRX and ANFFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2001

0.94

The correlation between JAMRX and ANFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAMRX vs. ANFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAMRX
JAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
JAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ANFFX
ANFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ANFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ANFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAMRX vs. ANFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAMRXANFFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

3.32

-1.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

4.14

-1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.56

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

4.24

-2.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.53

19.03

-13.50

JAMRX vs. ANFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the ANFFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAMRX and ANFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAMRXANFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

3.32

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.73

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.86

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.53

+0.06

Drawdowns

JAMRX vs. ANFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAMRX drawdown since its inception was -71.20%, which is greater than ANFFX's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAMRX and ANFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAMRXANFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.20%

-55.37%

-15.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.09%

-13.36%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

-20.81%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.53%

-37.10%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.53%

-37.10%

+0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.65%

-11.37%

-10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

2.98%

+1.97%

Volatility

JAMRX vs. ANFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) is 3.73%, while American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that JAMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAMRXANFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

5.27%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

13.72%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

17.22%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.13%

19.39%

+2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

19.11%

+2.26%

JAMRX vs. ANFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAMRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than ANFFX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAMRX vs. ANFFX - Dividend Comparison

JAMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%, more than ANFFX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1
8.06%9.90%9.56%3.89%0.00%7.53%2.45%7.26%9.84%8.19%2.13%6.07%
JAMRX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
10.94%11.98%10.22%2.88%0.28%13.02%2.91%10.27%10.92%8.17%5.60%9.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAMRX and ANFFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANFFX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to JAMRX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAMRX dropped -71.20% vs ANFFX's -55.37%.

ANFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAMRX and ANFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer