PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAMRX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAMRX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAMRX achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 35.24% return. Over the past 10 years, JAMRX has outperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 17.43%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.07% annualized return.


JAMRX

1D
-1.49%
1M
1.04%
YTD
6.18%
6M
5.06%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
17.43%

RYGRX

1D
1.49%
1M
10.34%
YTD
35.24%
6M
32.32%
1Y
42.19%
3Y*
27.04%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAMRX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAMRX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
6.18%18.32%41.65%43.02%-30.03%20.08%32.67%35.28%-2.84%25.89%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
35.24%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between JAMRX and RYGRX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.92

The correlation between JAMRX and RYGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAMRX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAMRX
JAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
JAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAMRX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAMRXRYGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

3.96

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

14.75

-10.42

JAMRX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAMRX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAMRX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAMRX drawdown since its inception was -71.20%, which is greater than RYGRX's maximum drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAMRX and RYGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAMRXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.20%

-54.22%

-16.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.09%

-11.17%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

-24.95%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.53%

-36.57%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.53%

-36.63%

+0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

0.00%

-2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.62%

-9.39%

-12.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

2.99%

+2.04%

Volatility

JAMRX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) is 7.28%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that JAMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAMRXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

9.88%

-2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

18.39%

-4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

21.58%

-4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.31%

23.83%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.47%

23.05%

-1.58%

JAMRX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAMRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAMRX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

JAMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.28%, more than RYGRX's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAMRX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
11.28%11.98%10.22%2.88%0.28%13.02%2.91%10.27%10.92%8.17%5.60%9.61%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.76%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAMRX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to JAMRX (7.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAMRX dropped -71.20% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAMRX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer