PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAJL vs. PBQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAJL vs. PBQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAJL achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly lower than PBQQ's 9.10% return.


JAJL

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.79%
YTD
2.52%
6M
2.86%
1Y
7.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBQQ

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.58%
YTD
9.10%
6M
9.79%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAJL vs. PBQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JAJL and PBQQ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.72

The correlation between JAJL and PBQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAJL vs. PBQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAJL
JAJL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JAJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAJL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
JAJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAJL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PBQQ
PBQQ Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PBQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PBQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAJL vs. PBQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAJLPBQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.83

1.59

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.76

4.47

+3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.16

21.36

+16.80

JAJL vs. PBQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAJL Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is comparable to the PBQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAJL and PBQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAJLPBQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38

2.94

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.69

1.50

+1.18

Drawdowns

JAJL vs. PBQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAJL drawdown since its inception was -2.16%, smaller than the maximum PBQQ drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAJL and PBQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAJLPBQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-12.92%

+10.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.01%

-4.71%

+3.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.21%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-1.26%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.98%

-0.78%

Volatility

JAJL vs. PBQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) is 0.35%, while PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) has a volatility of 1.07%. This indicates that JAJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAJLPBQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.35%

1.07%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.39%

5.51%

-4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32%

7.18%

-4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.67%

11.88%

-9.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.67%

11.88%

-9.21%

JAJL vs. PBQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBQQ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAJL vs. PBQQ - Dividend Comparison

JAJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JAJL and PBQQ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBQQ has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to JAJL (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAJL dropped -2.16% vs PBQQ's -12.92%.

On 1-year performance, PBQQ leads with 20.98% vs 7.79% for JAJL. On fees, PBQQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, JAJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PBQQ has performed better with a 20.98% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBQQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JAJL.

PBQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for JAJL.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JAJL and 0.50% for PBQQ.

JAJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAJL and PBQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer