PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAGLX vs. PDFDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAGLX vs. PDFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) and Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAGLX achieves a -3.64% return, which is significantly lower than PDFDX's 1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, JAGLX has outperformed PDFDX with an annualized return of 10.81%, while PDFDX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.82% annualized return.


JAGLX

1D
-2.63%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
-3.64%
6M
-2.05%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
10.81%

PDFDX

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.46%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.97%
1Y
31.05%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
-4.76%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAGLX vs. PDFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T
-3.64%24.72%8.50%7.41%-2.79%6.66%25.52%29.12%4.05%22.13%
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
1.98%9.94%19.19%10.77%-39.93%2.11%62.16%15.01%22.19%11.58%

Correlation

The correlation between JAGLX and PDFDX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.60

The correlation between JAGLX and PDFDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAGLX vs. PDFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAGLX
JAGLX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JAGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JAGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

PDFDX
PDFDX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PDFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PDFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAGLX vs. PDFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) and Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAGLXPDFDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.22

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.52

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.39

4.28

+4.10

JAGLX vs. PDFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the PDFDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAGLX and PDFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAGLXPDFDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.29

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

-0.16

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.34

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.38

+0.20

Drawdowns

JAGLX vs. PDFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAGLX drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, smaller than the maximum PDFDX drawdown of -67.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAGLX and PDFDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAGLXPDFDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-67.44%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-22.11%

+12.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.41%

-31.75%

+14.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.25%

-59.95%

+37.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.38%

-62.70%

+35.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.54%

-34.65%

+28.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.43%

-25.72%

+8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

7.80%

-4.77%

Volatility

JAGLX vs. PDFDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) is 4.69%, while Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that JAGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAGLXPDFDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

6.50%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

18.09%

-7.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

26.02%

-11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

29.80%

-13.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

28.96%

-11.55%

JAGLX vs. PDFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAGLX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than PDFDX's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAGLX vs. PDFDX - Dividend Comparison

JAGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than PDFDX's 9.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T
4.70%4.53%10.98%4.22%0.14%9.78%7.75%6.17%13.38%0.89%1.13%9.09%
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
9.60%4.25%0.00%0.00%1.78%31.11%1.71%0.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAGLX and PDFDX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDFDX has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to JAGLX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAGLX dropped -58.96% vs PDFDX's -67.44%.

JAGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAGLX and PDFDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer