JABS vs. JSML
JABS (Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and JSML (Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JABS is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while JSML is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index. JABS is actively managed, while JSML is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JABS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JSML.
Performance
JABS vs. JSML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JABS achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than JSML's 23.76% return.
JABS
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JSML
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 7.36%
- YTD
- 23.76%
- 6M
- 20.73%
- 1Y
- 38.96%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
JABS vs. JSML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 1.32% | 2.49% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 23.76% | 9.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between JABS and JSML is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JABS vs. JSML — Risk / Return Rank
JABS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JSML
JABS vs. JSML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JABS | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JABS vs. JSML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JABS drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum JSML drawdown of -39.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABS and JSML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JABS | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -39.65% | +38.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.54% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -10.81% | +10.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.18% | — |
Volatility
JABS vs. JSML - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JABS | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98% | 22.28% | -20.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 24.51% | -22.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 24.32% | -22.34% |
JABS vs. JSML - Expense Ratio Comparison
JABS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than JSML's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
JABS vs. JSML - Dividend Comparison
JABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than JSML's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.19% | 2.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.77% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JABS and JSML have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JSML is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JSML is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for JABS.
JABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.77% for JSML.
JABS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while JSML is Small Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for JABS and 0.30% for JSML.
Find the right allocation for JABS and JSML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer