JABS vs. BLST
JABS (Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JABS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLST.
Performance
JABS vs. BLST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JABS achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than BLST's 0.25% return.
JABS
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLST
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JABS vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 1.29% | 2.49% |
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 0.25% | 2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between JABS and BLST is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JABS vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JABS | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.23 | 1.51 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
JABS vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JABS drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum BLST drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABS and BLST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JABS | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -1.69% | +0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.92% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -0.35% | +0.17% |
Volatility
JABS vs. BLST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JABS | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00% | 2.21% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.00% | 2.21% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.00% | 2.21% | -0.21% |
JABS vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison
JABS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than BLST's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
JABS vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison
JABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than BLST's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 3.38% | 2.11% |
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.19% | 2.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JABS and BLST have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLST is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLST is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for JABS.
JABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 3.38% for BLST.
They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for JABS and 0.23% for BLST.
Find the right allocation for JABS and BLST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer