IYZ vs. IGF
IYZ (iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYZ is a Communications Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYZ returned 5.94%/yr vs 8.67%/yr for IGF. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYZ charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
IYZ vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYZ achieves a 29.57% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 9.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IYZ has underperformed IGF with an annualized return of 5.94%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.67% annualized return.
IYZ
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- 29.57%
- 6M
- 32.60%
- 1Y
- 56.05%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 5.94%
IGF
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 16.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
IYZ vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF | 29.57% | 29.28% | 20.53% | 3.90% | -30.29% | 11.69% | 4.13% | 16.14% | -8.59% | -11.86% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.68% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYZ and IGF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007 | 0.62 |
The correlation between IYZ and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYZ vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
IYZ
IGF
IYZ vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYZ | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.27 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.54 | 2.78 | +3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.99 | 8.03 | +17.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYZ vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYZ drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than IGF's maximum drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYZ and IGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYZ | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.11% | -58.33% | -18.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -5.87% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.85% | -14.28% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.74% | -20.83% | -18.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.74% | -42.11% | +2.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -2.98% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.10% | -11.86% | -28.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.04% | +0.13% |
Volatility
IYZ vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.85%. This indicates that IYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYZ | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.76% | 3.85% | +4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 8.73% | +6.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 10.58% | +8.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 14.00% | +4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 16.83% | +2.47% |
IYZ vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYZ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYZ vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
IYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than IGF's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.94% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF | 1.53% | 2.04% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 2.60% | 2.36% | 2.15% | 3.54% | 2.27% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYZ and IGF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYZ has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to IGF (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYZ dropped -77.11% vs IGF's -58.33%.
On 10-year performance, IGF leads with 8.67% vs 5.94% for IYZ. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGF has performed better with a 8.67% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYZ.
IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 1.53% for IYZ.
IYZ is categorized as Communications Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. IYZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYZ and 0.39% for IGF.
IYZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYZ and IGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer