IYT vs. XHB
IYT (iShares Transportation Average ETF) and XHB (SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYT is a Transportation Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index, while XHB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYT returned 11.08%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for XHB. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYT charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHB.
Performance
IYT vs. XHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYT achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly higher than XHB's 4.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IYT has underperformed XHB with an annualized return of 11.08%, while XHB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.53% annualized return.
IYT
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 7.88%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 13.90%
- 1Y
- 34.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
XHB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 14.89%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
IYT vs. XHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYT iShares Transportation Average ETF | 16.53% | 11.48% | 4.10% | 24.62% | -21.74% | 26.41% | 14.20% | 20.11% | -12.87% | 18.89% |
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 4.66% | -0.69% | 9.87% | 60.10% | -28.93% | 49.70% | 27.97% | 41.30% | -25.73% | 31.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYT and XHB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IYT and XHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
IYT vs. XHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYT
XHB
Industrials
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
IYT
XHB
Technology
IYT
XHB
-
Basic Materials
IYT
-
XHB
-
Communication Services
IYT
-
XHB
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYT
-
XHB
Consumer Defensive
IYT
-
XHB
-
Energy
IYT
-
XHB
-
Financial Services
IYT
-
XHB
-
Healthcare
IYT
-
XHB
-
Real Estate
IYT
-
XHB
Utilities
IYT
-
XHB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYT vs. XHB — Risk / Return Rank
IYT
XHB
IYT vs. XHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) and SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYT | XHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.09 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 0.55 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.56 | 1.13 | +7.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYT vs. XHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYT drawdown since its inception was -60.39%, smaller than the maximum XHB drawdown of -81.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYT and XHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYT | XHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.39% | -81.61% | +21.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.09% | -21.71% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.35% | -30.53% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.15% | -39.46% | +10.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.28% | -49.57% | +8.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.34% | +13.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -27.58% | +18.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 10.51% | -6.80% |
Volatility
IYT vs. XHB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) is 6.45%, while SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that IYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYT | XHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 9.42% | -2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 20.63% | -4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.61% | 28.30% | -7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 27.77% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.18% | 27.47% | -4.29% |
IYT vs. XHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XHB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYT vs. XHB - Dividend Comparison
IYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than XHB's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYT iShares Transportation Average ETF | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.08% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 0.92% | 0.96% | 1.28% |
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.59% | 0.77% | 1.06% | 0.51% | 0.73% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.72% | 0.67% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYT and XHB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XHB has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to IYT (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYT dropped -60.39% vs XHB's -81.61%.
On 10-year performance, XHB leads with 13.53% vs 11.08% for IYT. On fees, XHB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYT has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XHB has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYT.
IYT has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.60% for XHB.
IYT is categorized as Transportation Equities, while XHB is Building & Construction. IYT tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index, while XHB tracks S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYT and 0.35% for XHB.
IYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYT and XHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer