PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYT vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYT vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYT achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 4.00% return. Over the past 10 years, IYT has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 10.51%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.


IYT

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.94%
YTD
13.12%
6M
15.04%
1Y
30.40%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
10.51%

IAU

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
4.00%
6M
6.47%
1Y
32.38%
3Y*
31.72%
5Y*
18.82%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYT vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
13.12%11.48%4.10%24.62%-21.74%26.41%14.20%20.11%-12.87%18.89%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
4.00%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IYT and IAU is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005

0.01

The correlation between IYT and IAU shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (10 years) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYT vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYT
IAU

Industrials

83.3%

-

Technology

16.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

IYT
83.3%
IAU

-

Technology

IYT
16.7%
IAU

-

Basic Materials

IYT

-

IAU

-

Communication Services

IYT

-

IAU

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYT

-

IAU

-

Consumer Defensive

IYT

-

IAU

-

Energy

IYT

-

IAU

-

Financial Services

IYT

-

IAU

-

Healthcare

IYT

-

IAU

-

Real Estate

IYT

-

IAU
100.0%

Utilities

IYT

-

IAU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYT vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYT
IYT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYT Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYT vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYTIAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

1.23

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

1.63

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.87

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.00

4.69

+3.31

IYT vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYT and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYTIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.23

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

1.05

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.85

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.63

-0.21

Drawdowns

IYT vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYT drawdown since its inception was -60.39%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYT and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYTIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.39%

-45.14%

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.09%

-19.18%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

-19.18%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-20.93%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.28%

-21.82%

-19.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-16.88%

+15.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-15.96%

+6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

7.63%

-3.90%

Volatility

IYT vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 5.78%. This indicates that IYT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYTIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

5.78%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

23.00%

-7.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.17%

26.51%

-6.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.29%

17.96%

+4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.15%

15.90%

+7.25%

IYT vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYT vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

IYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
0.95%1.00%1.08%1.26%1.40%0.77%0.93%1.29%1.35%0.92%0.96%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYT and IAU have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYT has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to IAU (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYT dropped -60.39% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.42% vs 10.51% for IYT. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IAU has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.42% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYT.

IYT has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

IYT is categorized as Transportation Equities, while IAU is Gold. IYT tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYT and 0.25% for IAU.

IYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYT and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer