PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYRI vs. QQQH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYRI vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYRI achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly lower than QQQH's 7.91% return.


IYRI

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
4.08%
6M
3.47%
1Y
8.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQH

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.93%
YTD
7.91%
6M
7.82%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYRI vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IYRI and QQQH is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025

0.30

IYRI vs. QQQH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYRI
QQQH

Real Estate

98.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.2%

Communication Services

0.6%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.6%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.1%

Industrials

-

3.1%

Technology

-

53.5%

Utilities

-

1.3%

Real Estate

IYRI
98.0%
QQQH
0.1%

Basic Materials

IYRI
1.3%
QQQH
1.2%

Communication Services

IYRI
0.6%
QQQH
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IYRI

-

QQQH
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

IYRI

-

QQQH
7.6%

Energy

IYRI

-

QQQH
0.6%

Financial Services

IYRI

-

QQQH
0.2%

Healthcare

IYRI

-

QQQH
4.1%

Industrials

IYRI

-

QQQH
3.1%

Technology

IYRI

-

QQQH
53.5%

Utilities

IYRI

-

QQQH
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYRI vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYRI
IYRI Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IYRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYRI Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IYRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYRI Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQH
QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYRI vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYRIQQQHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

2.09

-1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

2.85

-1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.39

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.90

-1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.00

12.60

-8.60

IYRI vs. QQQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYRI Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the QQQH Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYRI and QQQH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYRIQQQHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

2.09

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.79

-0.11

Drawdowns

IYRI vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYRI drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum QQQH drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYRI and QQQH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYRIQQQHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-31.24%

+19.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-6.96%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-0.02%

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-8.27%

+6.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.60%

+0.49%

Volatility

IYRI vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) at 1.73%. This indicates that IYRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYRIQQQHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

1.73%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.17%

7.34%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

9.67%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.07%

13.20%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.07%

13.37%

-0.30%

IYRI vs. QQQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IYRI and QQQH have an expense ratio of 0.68%.


Dividends

IYRI vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison

IYRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, more than QQQH's 8.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IYRI
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
11.27%11.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
8.74%8.86%7.53%7.18%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYRI and QQQH have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYRI has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to QQQH (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYRI dropped -12.12% vs QQQH's -31.24%.

On 1-year performance, QQQH leads with 20.09% vs 8.34% for IYRI. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQH has been the lower-risk option at 1.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQH has performed better with a 20.09% return vs 8.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYRI and QQQH have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

IYRI has the higher dividend yield at 11.27%, compared with 8.74% for QQQH.

IYRI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQH is Nasdaq-100.

QQQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYRI and QQQH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer