PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYRI vs. BTCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYRI vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYRI achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -24.11% return.


IYRI

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.21%
6M
7.99%
YTD
9.43%
1Y
10.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.71%

BTCI

1D
0.81%
1M
4.74%
6M
-14.61%
YTD
-24.11%
1Y
-39.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.51M$12.64M$21.73M
$3.36M$3.54M$3.80M

IYRI vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IYRI
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
9.43%6.99%
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
-24.11%-4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IYRI and BTCI is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYRI vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYRI
IYRI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IYRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IYRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYRI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCI
BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYRI vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYRIBTCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.84

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

-0.82

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.25

-1.28

+6.53

IYRI vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYRI Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYRI and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYRI vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYRI drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -48.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYRI and BTCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYRIBTCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-48.42%

+36.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-48.42%

+40.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-43.88%

+43.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-17.93%

+16.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

31.03%

-28.97%

Volatility

IYRI vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) is 2.76%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that IYRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYRIBTCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

6.57%

-3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

30.06%

-21.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

39.96%

-29.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

39.60%

-26.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.98%

39.60%

-26.62%

IYRI vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYRI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYRI vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

IYRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.84%, less than BTCI's 40.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
40.38%36.46%6.76%
IYRI
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
10.84%11.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYRI and BTCI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCI has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to IYRI (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYRI dropped -12.12% vs BTCI's -48.42%.

On 1-year performance, IYRI leads with 10.79% vs -39.55% for BTCI. On fees, IYRI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, IYRI has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IYRI has performed better with a 10.79% return vs -39.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYRI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 40.38%, compared with 10.84% for IYRI.

IYRI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IYRI and 0.99% for BTCI.

IYRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYRI and BTCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer