IYRI vs. BTCI
IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IYRI returned 10.79% vs -39.55% for BTCI. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IYRI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.
Performance
IYRI vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYRI achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -24.11% return.
IYRI
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 7.99%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 10.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.71%
BTCI
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- 6M
- -14.61%
- YTD
- -24.11%
- 1Y
- -39.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.51M | $12.64M | $21.73M | |
| $3.36M | $3.54M | $3.80M |
IYRI vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 9.43% | 6.99% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -24.11% | -4.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYRI and BTCI is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYRI vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
IYRI
BTCI
IYRI vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYRI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.84 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | -0.82 | +2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | -1.28 | +6.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYRI vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYRI drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -48.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYRI and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYRI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -48.42% | +36.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -48.42% | +40.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -43.88% | +43.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -17.93% | +16.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 31.03% | -28.97% |
Volatility
IYRI vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) is 2.76%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that IYRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYRI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 6.57% | -3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.10% | 30.06% | -21.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.69% | 39.96% | -29.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 39.60% | -26.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 39.60% | -26.62% |
IYRI vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYRI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYRI vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
IYRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.84%, less than BTCI's 40.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 40.38% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 10.84% | 11.72% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYRI and BTCI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to IYRI (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYRI dropped -12.12% vs BTCI's -48.42%.
On 1-year performance, IYRI leads with 10.79% vs -39.55% for BTCI. On fees, IYRI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, IYRI has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IYRI has performed better with a 10.79% return vs -39.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYRI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 40.38%, compared with 10.84% for IYRI.
IYRI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IYRI and 0.99% for BTCI.
IYRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYRI and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer