IYRI vs. BTCI
IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYRI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. IYRI is passively managed, while BTCI is actively managed. Over the past year, IYRI returned 8.34% vs -33.43% for BTCI. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYRI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.
Performance
IYRI vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYRI achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -22.74% return.
IYRI
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 8.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -16.29%
- YTD
- -22.74%
- 6M
- -26.41%
- 1Y
- -33.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYRI vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 4.08% | 7.95% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -22.74% | -7.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYRI and BTCI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYRI vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
IYRI
BTCI
IYRI vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYRI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.87 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | -0.75 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | -1.34 | +5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYRI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | -0.86 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | -0.03 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
IYRI vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYRI drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYRI and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYRI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -44.98% | +32.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -44.98% | +37.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -42.87% | +40.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -15.18% | +13.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 25.05% | -22.96% |
Volatility
IYRI vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) is 3.03%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 8.35%. This indicates that IYRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYRI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 8.35% | -5.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 30.94% | -23.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 38.93% | -28.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 40.11% | -27.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 40.11% | -27.04% |
IYRI vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYRI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYRI vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
IYRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, less than BTCI's 43.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 43.16% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 11.27% | 11.72% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYRI and BTCI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to IYRI (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYRI dropped -12.12% vs BTCI's -44.98%.
On 1-year performance, IYRI leads with 8.34% vs -33.43% for BTCI. On fees, IYRI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, IYRI has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IYRI has performed better with a 8.34% return vs -33.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYRI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 43.16%, compared with 11.27% for IYRI.
IYRI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IYRI and 0.99% for BTCI.
IYRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYRI and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer