IYLD vs. CGBL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IYLD (iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF) and CGBL (Capital Group Core Balanced ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. IYLD is passively managed, while CGBL is actively managed. Over the past year, IYLD returned 14.05% vs 18.31% for CGBL. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGBL.

Performance

IYLD vs. CGBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYLD achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than CGBL's 7.54% return.

IYLD

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 5.14%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 14.05%
• 3Y*: 10.71%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: 3.98%

CGBL

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 7.54%
• 6M: 8.49%
• 1Y: 18.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYLD vs. CGBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IYLD iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF	5.14%	15.44%	2.00%	8.70%
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	7.54%	15.33%	16.64%	9.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IYLD and CGBL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.68

The correlation between IYLD and CGBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYLD vs. CGBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IYLD	CGBL
Financial Services	23.3%	11.8%
Real Estate	23.1%	0.0%
Industrials	12.2%	16.6%
Technology	6.3%	29.9%
Utilities	6.0%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	8.7%
Basic Materials	5.9%	7.2%
Healthcare	5.2%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	4.2%
Communication Services	3.8%	8.4%
Energy	3.6%	2.0%

Return for Risk

IYLD vs. CGBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYLD

IYLD Risk / Return Rank: 74
IYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
IYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 80
IYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
IYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CGBL

CGBL Risk / Return Rank: 57
CGBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
CGBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CGBL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CGBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
CGBL Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYLD vs. CGBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IYLD	CGBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	1.92	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	2.78	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.35	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	2.33	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.82	10.36	+1.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IYLD vs. CGBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the CGBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYLD and CGBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IYLD	CGBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	1.92	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	1.72	-1.22

Drawdowns

IYLD vs. CGBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYLD drawdown since its inception was -30.23%, which is greater than CGBL's maximum drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYLD and CGBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IYLD	CGBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.23%	-11.66%	-18.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.63%	-7.88%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-0.53%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.53%	-1.29%	-3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	1.77%	-0.58%

Volatility

IYLD vs. CGBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) is 1.48%, while Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that IYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IYLD	CGBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	3.10%	-1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.69%	7.84%	-3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.73%	9.60%	-3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.86%	11.02%	-3.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.57%	11.02%	-1.45%

IYLD vs. CGBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CGBL's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

IYLD vs. CGBL - Dividend Comparison

IYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than CGBL's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	1.85%	1.98%	1.92%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IYLD iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF	4.60%	4.72%	5.32%	5.76%	5.45%	3.47%	4.38%	5.25%	5.78%	4.22%	4.84%	5.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IYLD and CGBL in my portfolio?

IYLD and CGBL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IYLD or CGBL?

CGBL has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to IYLD (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYLD dropped -30.23% vs CGBL's -11.66%.

Which ETF is better, IYLD or CGBL?

On 1-year performance, CGBL leads with 18.31% vs 14.05% for IYLD. On fees, CGBL is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, IYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IYLD or CGBL?

Over the 1-year period, CGBL has performed better with a 18.31% return vs 14.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IYLD or CGBL?

CGBL is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IYLD or CGBL?

IYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 1.85% for CGBL.

What is the main difference between IYLD and CGBL?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IYLD and 0.33% for CGBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.