PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYLD vs. RIGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYLD vs. RIGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYLD achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly higher than RIGS's 0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IYLD has outperformed RIGS with an annualized return of 3.84%, while RIGS has yielded a comparatively lower 2.86% annualized return.


IYLD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.34%
6M
2.24%
YTD
5.72%
1Y
13.16%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*
3.84%
ALL TIME*
4.33%

RIGS

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.80%
6M
-0.37%
YTD
0.19%
1Y
1.36%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
2.86%
ALL TIME*
3.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$181.04K$278.59K$373.50K
$207.82K$182.23K$172.39K

IYLD vs. RIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYLD
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF
5.72%15.44%2.00%12.55%-16.80%3.37%-1.18%15.82%-4.77%10.90%
RIGS
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
0.19%4.63%4.45%6.07%-5.72%1.93%3.58%7.60%-0.11%4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IYLD and RIGS is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2013

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between IYLD and RIGS has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYLD vs. RIGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYLD
IYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

RIGS
RIGS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RIGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIGS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
RIGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYLD vs. RIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYLDRIGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.06

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

0.52

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.17

1.16

+10.01

IYLD vs. RIGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the RIGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYLD and RIGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYLD vs. RIGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYLD drawdown since its inception was -30.23%, which is greater than RIGS's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYLD and RIGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYLDRIGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.23%

-15.31%

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-4.55%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.20%

-5.18%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.57%

-9.03%

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.23%

-15.31%

-14.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-2.24%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-1.60%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

2.02%

-0.84%

Volatility

IYLD vs. RIGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) is 1.40%, while RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that IYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYLDRIGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

4.05%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.76%

6.53%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

10.31%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.88%

7.87%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.54%

7.90%

+1.64%

IYLD vs. RIGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RIGS's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYLD vs. RIGS - Dividend Comparison

IYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, less than RIGS's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYLD
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF
4.61%4.72%5.32%5.76%5.45%3.47%4.38%5.25%5.78%4.22%4.84%5.26%
RIGS
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
4.90%4.84%4.49%3.48%2.71%2.47%3.77%3.87%4.54%4.45%4.46%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYLD and RIGS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIGS has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to IYLD (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYLD dropped -30.23% vs RIGS's -15.31%.

On 10-year performance, IYLD leads with 3.84% vs 2.86% for RIGS. On fees, RIGS is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, IYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYLD has performed better with a 3.84% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RIGS is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IYLD.

RIGS has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 4.61% for IYLD.

IYLD is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while RIGS is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IYLD and 0.48% for RIGS.

IYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYLD and RIGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer