PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYLD vs. AOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYLD vs. AOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) and iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYLD achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than AOA's 9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IYLD has underperformed AOA with an annualized return of 3.84%, while AOA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.26% annualized return.


IYLD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.34%
6M
2.24%
YTD
5.72%
1Y
13.16%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*
3.84%
ALL TIME*
4.33%

AOA

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.25%
6M
6.38%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
19.59%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
10.26%
ALL TIME*
10.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.98M$10.05M$10.43M
$181.04K$278.59K$373.50K

IYLD vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYLD
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF
5.72%15.44%2.00%12.55%-16.80%3.37%-1.18%15.82%-4.77%10.90%
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
9.12%19.59%13.55%18.27%-16.23%15.42%12.82%22.60%-7.86%20.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IYLD and AOA is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2012

0.73

The correlation between IYLD and AOA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYLD vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYLD
IYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

AOA
AOA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYLD vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) and iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYLDAOADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.30

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.27

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.17

9.56

+1.61

IYLD vs. AOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the AOA Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYLD and AOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYLD vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYLD drawdown since its inception was -30.23%, which is greater than AOA's maximum drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYLD and AOA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYLDAOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.23%

-28.38%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-8.20%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.20%

-12.94%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.57%

-23.62%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.23%

-28.38%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-1.23%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-4.03%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.94%

-0.76%

Volatility

IYLD vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) is 1.40%, while iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that IYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYLDAOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

3.19%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.76%

9.61%

-4.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

11.49%

-5.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.88%

13.10%

-5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.54%

13.50%

-3.96%

IYLD vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYLD vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison

IYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than AOA's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.13%2.18%2.30%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.26%2.15%
IYLD
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF
4.61%4.72%5.32%5.76%5.45%3.47%4.38%5.25%5.78%4.22%4.84%5.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYLD and AOA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOA has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to IYLD (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYLD dropped -30.23% vs AOA's -28.38%.

On 10-year performance, AOA leads with 10.26% vs 3.84% for IYLD. On fees, AOA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AOA has performed better with a 10.26% return vs 3.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AOA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IYLD.

IYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 2.13% for AOA.

IYLD tracks Morningstar Multi-Asset High Income Index, while AOA tracks S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IYLD and 0.15% for AOA.

IYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYLD and AOA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer