IYK vs. COWZ
IYK (iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYK is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IYK returned 5.51%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for COWZ. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYK charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
IYK vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYK achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 8.30% return.
IYK
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 5.46%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- 1Y
- 1.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
COWZ
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- —
IYK vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 5.46% | 4.78% | 5.27% | -2.84% | 3.57% | 17.32% | 32.65% | 28.12% | -13.84% | 16.53% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.30% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYK and COWZ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IYK and COWZ has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IYK vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYK
COWZ
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
IYK
COWZ
Healthcare
IYK
COWZ
Basic Materials
IYK
COWZ
Consumer Cyclical
IYK
COWZ
Industrials
IYK
COWZ
Communication Services
IYK
-
COWZ
Energy
IYK
-
COWZ
Financial Services
IYK
-
COWZ
-
Real Estate
IYK
-
COWZ
-
Technology
IYK
-
COWZ
Utilities
IYK
-
COWZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYK vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
IYK
COWZ
IYK vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYK | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.37 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 4.57 | -4.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 12.47 | -12.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYK | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 2.06 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.60 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.65 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
IYK vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYK drawdown since its inception was -42.64%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYK and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYK | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.64% | -38.63% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -5.00% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.14% | -22.00% | +9.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.05% | -22.00% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -0.80% | -8.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -4.80% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 1.83% | +3.22% |
Volatility
IYK vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.50%. This indicates that IYK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYK | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 2.50% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 7.12% | +2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 11.08% | +1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 17.63% | -4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 19.92% | -4.42% |
IYK vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYK has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYK vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
IYK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than COWZ's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.16% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 2.69% | 2.75% | 2.63% | 2.74% | 2.16% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 2.21% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 2.63% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYK and COWZ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYK has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to COWZ (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYK dropped -42.64% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.60% vs 5.51% for IYK. On fees, IYK is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 5.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYK is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.
IYK has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.16% for COWZ.
IYK is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. IYK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYK and 0.49% for COWZ.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYK and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer