IYK vs. XLP
IYK (iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - IYK tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index while XLP tracks the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYK returned 9.22%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for XLP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IYK charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
IYK vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IYK having a 7.31% return and XLP slightly lower at 7.13%. Over the past 10 years, IYK has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 9.22%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.
IYK
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
XLP
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 4.96%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
IYK vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 7.31% | 4.78% | 5.27% | -2.84% | 3.57% | 17.32% | 32.65% | 28.12% | -13.84% | 16.53% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 7.13% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYK and XLP is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2000 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IYK and XLP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
IYK vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYK
XLP
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
IYK
XLP
Healthcare
IYK
XLP
-
Basic Materials
IYK
XLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYK
XLP
Industrials
IYK
XLP
-
Communication Services
IYK
-
XLP
-
Energy
IYK
-
XLP
-
Financial Services
IYK
-
XLP
-
Real Estate
IYK
-
XLP
-
Technology
IYK
-
XLP
-
Utilities
IYK
-
XLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYK vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
IYK
XLP
IYK vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYK | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.07 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 0.51 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 0.98 | -0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYK vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYK drawdown since its inception was -42.64%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYK and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYK | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.64% | -35.90% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -9.69% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.14% | -12.39% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.05% | -16.30% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.19% | -24.51% | -8.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.50% | -7.55% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -7.06% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 5.08% | +0.12% |
Volatility
IYK vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 4.82%. This indicates that IYK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYK | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 4.82% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 10.38% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 13.03% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 13.34% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 14.77% | +0.78% |
IYK vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYK has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYK vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
IYK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than XLP's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 2.67% | 2.75% | 2.63% | 2.74% | 2.16% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 2.21% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 2.63% | 2.11% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.35% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IYK and XLP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IYK has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to XLP (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYK dropped -42.64% vs XLP's -35.90%.
On 10-year performance, IYK leads with 9.22% vs 7.31% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYK has performed better with a 9.22% return vs 7.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYK.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.67% for IYK.
IYK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYK and 0.08% for XLP.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYK and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer