IYK vs. RTH
IYK (iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF) and RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYK is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, while RTH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYK returned 9.22%/yr vs 14.09%/yr for RTH. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYK charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.
Performance
IYK vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYK achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly higher than RTH's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IYK has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of 9.22%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.
IYK
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
RTH
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 10.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
IYK vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 7.31% | 4.78% | 5.27% | -2.84% | 3.57% | 17.32% | 32.65% | 28.12% | -13.84% | 16.53% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 1.55% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYK and RTH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2001 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IYK and RTH has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IYK vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYK
RTH
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
IYK
RTH
Healthcare
IYK
RTH
Basic Materials
IYK
RTH
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYK
RTH
Industrials
IYK
RTH
Communication Services
IYK
-
RTH
-
Energy
IYK
-
RTH
-
Financial Services
IYK
-
RTH
-
Real Estate
IYK
-
RTH
-
Technology
IYK
-
RTH
-
Utilities
IYK
-
RTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYK vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank
IYK
RTH
IYK vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYK | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.15 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.29 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 4.15 | -3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYK vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYK drawdown since its inception was -42.64%, roughly equal to the maximum RTH drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYK and RTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYK | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.64% | -42.32% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -7.83% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.14% | -13.80% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.05% | -25.00% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.19% | -25.00% | -8.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.50% | -6.15% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -7.33% | +2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 2.44% | +2.76% |
Volatility
IYK vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 4.52%. This indicates that IYK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYK | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 4.52% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 9.69% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 12.41% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 16.85% | -3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 17.58% | -2.03% |
IYK vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYK has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYK vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
IYK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than RTH's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 2.67% | 2.75% | 2.63% | 2.74% | 2.16% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 2.21% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 2.63% | 2.11% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.96% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYK and RTH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYK has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to RTH (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYK dropped -42.64% vs RTH's -42.32%.
On 10-year performance, RTH leads with 14.09% vs 9.22% for IYK. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RTH has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYK.
IYK has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.96% for RTH.
IYK is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while RTH is Consumer Discretionary Equities. IYK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYK and 0.35% for RTH.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYK and RTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer