IYH vs. IYC
IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) and IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while IYC is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYH returned 9.52%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for IYC. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYH charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYC.
Performance
IYH vs. IYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYH achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than IYC's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, IYH has underperformed IYC with an annualized return of 9.52%, while IYC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.83% annualized return.
IYH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
IYC
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -2.54%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
IYH vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -0.65% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -1.40% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 34.03% | -31.78% | 19.65% | 24.58% | 27.36% | 1.76% | 19.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYH and IYC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2000 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IYH and IYC has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IYH vs. IYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYH
IYC
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IYH
IYC
-
Basic Materials
IYH
-
IYC
-
Communication Services
IYH
-
IYC
Consumer Cyclical
IYH
-
IYC
Consumer Defensive
IYH
-
IYC
Energy
IYH
-
IYC
Financial Services
IYH
-
IYC
-
Industrials
IYH
-
IYC
Real Estate
IYH
-
IYC
-
Technology
IYH
-
IYC
Utilities
IYH
-
IYC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYH vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank
IYH
IYC
IYH vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYH | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.07 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 0.44 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 1.28 | +1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYH vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYH drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum IYC drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYH and IYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYH | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -53.10% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.64% | -11.97% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -21.62% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -35.90% | +17.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | -35.90% | +7.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -5.12% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.96% | -9.95% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 4.08% | +0.38% |
Volatility
IYH vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) at 4.33%. This indicates that IYH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYH | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 4.33% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 10.74% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 14.44% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 20.74% | -5.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 19.90% | -3.16% |
IYH vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYH has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYH vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison
IYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than IYC's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.25% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYH and IYC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYH has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to IYC (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYH dropped -43.12% vs IYC's -53.10%.
On 10-year performance, IYC leads with 11.83% vs 9.52% for IYH. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYC has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
IYH has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.50% for IYC.
IYH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IYC is Consumer Discretionary Equities. IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IYH and 0.38% for IYC.
IYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYH and IYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer