PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYG vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYG achieves a -3.88% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, IYG has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 13.56%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.84% annualized return.


IYG

1D
2.82%
1M
1.39%
YTD
-3.88%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
13.56%

QQQ

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.66%
YTD
20.71%
6M
19.19%
1Y
40.74%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.86%
10Y*
21.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
-3.88%19.85%31.94%16.07%-16.76%30.36%0.99%37.62%-12.56%24.47%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IYG and QQQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2000

0.62

The correlation between IYG and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYG
QQQ

Financial Services

100.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

IYG
100.0%
QQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

IYG

-

QQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

IYG

-

QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IYG

-

QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

IYG

-

QQQ
7.7%

Energy

IYG

-

QQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

IYG

-

QQQ
4.2%

Industrials

IYG

-

QQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

IYG

-

QQQ
0.1%

Technology

IYG

-

QQQ
53.8%

Utilities

IYG

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYG
IYG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYGQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.44

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

3.42

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

13.14

-11.63

IYG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYG and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYGQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

2.57

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.80

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.98

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.41

-0.19

Drawdowns

IYG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYG drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYG and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.84%

-82.97%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.90%

-11.96%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-22.77%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-35.12%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-35.12%

-9.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-0.74%

-6.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.74%

-32.78%

+12.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.11%

3.11%

+3.00%

Volatility

IYG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 4.41% and 4.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

4.51%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

12.10%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

15.94%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

22.37%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

22.29%

+1.25%

IYG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

IYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
1.11%1.00%1.16%1.77%2.07%1.25%1.71%1.59%1.81%1.24%1.28%1.33%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to IYG (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYG dropped -81.84% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.84% vs 13.56% for IYG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.84% return vs 13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYG.

IYG has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

IYG is categorized as Financials Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYG and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYG and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer