IYG vs. KBWP
IYG (iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF) and KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - IYG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR while KBWP tracks the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYG returned 14.99%/yr vs 12.53%/yr for KBWP. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYG charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWP.
Performance
IYG vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYG achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than KBWP's -0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IYG has outperformed KBWP with an annualized return of 14.99%, while KBWP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.53% annualized return.
IYG
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- -2.97%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
KBWP
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- -1.47%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
IYG vs. KBWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYG iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF | -1.05% | 19.85% | 31.94% | 16.07% | -16.76% | 30.36% | 0.99% | 37.62% | -12.56% | 24.47% |
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | -0.75% | 11.49% | 30.45% | 7.09% | 10.16% | 20.61% | -2.05% | 28.67% | -2.76% | 8.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYG and KBWP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2010 | 0.56 |
The correlation between IYG and KBWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.63 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IYG vs. KBWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYG
KBWP
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IYG
KBWP
Basic Materials
IYG
-
KBWP
-
Communication Services
IYG
-
KBWP
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYG
-
KBWP
-
Consumer Defensive
IYG
-
KBWP
-
Energy
IYG
-
KBWP
-
Healthcare
IYG
-
KBWP
-
Industrials
IYG
-
KBWP
-
Real Estate
IYG
-
KBWP
-
Technology
IYG
-
KBWP
-
Utilities
IYG
-
KBWP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYG vs. KBWP — Risk / Return Rank
IYG
KBWP
IYG vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYG | KBWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.06 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 0.44 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 0.95 | +0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYG vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYG drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than KBWP's maximum drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYG and KBWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYG | KBWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.84% | -39.76% | -42.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.90% | -9.56% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.54% | -12.29% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -17.00% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.32% | -39.76% | -4.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.50% | -1.57% | -2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.71% | -4.37% | -16.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.23% | 4.36% | +1.87% |
Volatility
IYG vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) is 4.46%, while Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that IYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYG | KBWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 5.89% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 12.13% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 16.57% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 18.54% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 20.73% | +2.71% |
IYG vs. KBWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWP's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYG vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison
IYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than KBWP's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYG iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF | 1.09% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 1.25% | 1.71% | 1.59% | 1.81% | 1.24% | 1.28% | 1.33% |
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.99% | 3.02% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 2.11% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYG and KBWP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBWP has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to IYG (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYG dropped -81.84% vs KBWP's -39.76%.
On 10-year performance, IYG leads with 14.99% vs 12.53% for KBWP. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYG has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYG.
KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.09% for IYG.
IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR, while KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYG and 0.35% for KBWP.
IYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYG and KBWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer