PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IYG vs. FDIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IYG vs. FDIQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IYG (iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF) and FDIQ (Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - IYG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR while FDIQ tracks the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYG returned 13.56%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for FDIQ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYG charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FDIQ.

Performance

IYG vs. FDIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYG achieves a -3.88% return, which is significantly lower than FDIQ's 11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, IYG has outperformed FDIQ with an annualized return of 13.56%, while FDIQ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.

IYG

1D
2.82%
1M
1.39%
YTD
-3.88%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
13.56%

FDIQ

1D
1.29%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
11.14%
6M
11.52%
1Y
25.64%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
7.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYG vs. FDIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF		-3.88%19.85%31.94%16.07%-16.76%30.36%0.99%37.62%-12.56%24.47%
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF		11.14%6.32%12.76%-0.84%-7.23%36.05%-8.95%23.57%-18.31%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IYG and FDIQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011

0.79

The correlation between IYG and FDIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF

Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF

Often compared with IYG:
IYG vs. IYFIYG vs. XLFIYG vs. IXGIYG vs. VFHIYG vs. FTXOIYG vs. GABFIYG vs. IYK
Often compared with FDIQ:
FDIQ vs. XLFFDIQ vs. KBWBFDIQ vs. IXGFDIQ vs. FNCLFDIQ vs. PBDCFDIQ vs. KBWDFDIQ vs. KRE

Return for Risk

IYG vs. FDIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IYG
IYG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
FDIQ
FDIQ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FDIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYG vs. FDIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IYGFDIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.59
1.16

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.89
1.74

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.23

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

2.31

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

5.84

-4.33

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IYG vs. FDIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the FDIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYG and FDIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IYGFDIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

1.16

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.14

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.24

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.37

-0.15

Drawdowns

IYG vs. FDIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYG drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than FDIQ's maximum drawdown of -52.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYG and FDIQ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IYGFDIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.84%

-52.86%

-28.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.90%

-11.13%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-28.09%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-42.99%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-52.86%

+8.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-7.34%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.74%

-11.55%

-9.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.11%

4.40%

+1.71%

Volatility

IYG vs. FDIQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) have volatilities of 4.41% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IYGFDIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

4.35%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

13.96%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

22.13%

-6.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

28.70%

-8.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

31.12%

-7.58%

IYG vs. FDIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IYG vs. FDIQ - Dividend Comparison

IYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than FDIQ's 2.52% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF		2.52%2.66%2.69%2.89%2.51%2.04%2.92%2.44%2.45%1.59%1.50%1.92%
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF		1.11%1.00%1.16%1.77%2.07%1.25%1.71%1.59%1.81%1.24%1.28%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

IYG and FDIQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYG has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to FDIQ (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYG dropped -81.84% vs FDIQ's -52.86%.

On 10-year performance, IYG leads with 13.56% vs 7.58% for FDIQ. On fees, FDIQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYG has performed better with a 13.56% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYG.

FDIQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.11% for IYG.

IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR, while FDIQ tracks Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYG and 0.35% for FDIQ.

FDIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYG and FDIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer