IYF vs. FNCL
IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) and FNCL (Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - IYF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index while FNCL tracks the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYF returned 12.56%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for FNCL. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IYF charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FNCL.
Performance
IYF vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYF achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly higher than FNCL's -6.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYF having a 12.56% annualized return and FNCL not far behind at 12.14%.
IYF
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
FNCL
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -6.43%
- 6M
- -3.99%
- 1Y
- 2.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
IYF vs. FNCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | -5.20% | 18.25% | 31.30% | 15.32% | -11.33% | 31.60% | -1.00% | 31.86% | -9.39% | 19.58% |
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | -6.43% | 14.94% | 30.44% | 14.10% | -12.28% | 34.92% | -2.19% | 31.59% | -13.44% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYF and FNCL is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013 | 0.98 |
The correlation between IYF and FNCL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
IYF vs. FNCL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYF
FNCL
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IYF
FNCL
Real Estate
IYF
FNCL
Technology
IYF
FNCL
Basic Materials
IYF
-
FNCL
-
Communication Services
IYF
-
FNCL
Consumer Cyclical
IYF
-
FNCL
Consumer Defensive
IYF
-
FNCL
-
Energy
IYF
-
FNCL
-
Healthcare
IYF
-
FNCL
Industrials
IYF
-
FNCL
Utilities
IYF
-
FNCL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYF vs. FNCL — Risk / Return Rank
IYF
FNCL
IYF vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYF | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 0.16 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.65 | 0.32 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.04 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 0.16 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 0.43 | +0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYF | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 0.16 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.41 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.55 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.53 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
IYF vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYF drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, which is greater than FNCL's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYF and FNCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYF | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.09% | -44.38% | -34.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -14.78% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -17.29% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -25.68% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.57% | -44.38% | +1.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.10% | -9.28% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.61% | -6.90% | -10.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | 5.56% | -0.50% |
Volatility
IYF vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) have volatilities of 3.41% and 3.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYF | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 3.26% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 11.03% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 14.76% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 19.26% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 22.34% | -1.45% |
IYF vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYF has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYF vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison
IYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than FNCL's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 1.70% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.91% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.37% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 2.17% |
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 1.57% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.64% | 1.90% | 1.46% | 1.67% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, IYF and FNCL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IYF has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to FNCL (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYF dropped -79.09% vs FNCL's -44.38%.
On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 12.56% vs 12.14% for FNCL. On fees, FNCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FNCL has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 12.56% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYF.
FNCL has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.57% for IYF.
IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, while FNCL tracks MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYF and 0.08% for FNCL.
IYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYF and FNCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer