FNCL vs. VFH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH).

FNCL and VFH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNCL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. VFH is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both FNCL and VFH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FNCL vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNCL vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF	-9.21%	14.94%	30.44%	14.10%	-12.28%	34.92%	-2.19%	31.59%	-13.44%	19.99%
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	-9.19%	14.91%	30.44%	14.17%	-12.31%	35.22%	-1.96%	31.57%	-13.52%	19.99%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FNCL having a -9.21% return and VFH slightly higher at -9.19%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNCL having a 12.24% annualized return and VFH not far ahead at 12.30%.

FNCL

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: -9.21%
• 6M: -6.36%
• 1Y: 2.88%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: 12.24%

VFH

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -3.54%
• YTD: -9.19%
• 6M: -6.32%
• 1Y: 2.78%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: 12.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCL vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VFH's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

VFH

Vanguard Financials ETF

FNCL

Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF

Return for Risk

FNCL vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCL

FNCL Risk / Return Rank: 15
FNCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FNCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FNCL Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FNCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FNCL Martin Ratio Rank: 15

VFH

VFH Risk / Return Rank: 15
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 15
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCL vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNCL	VFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	0.14	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	0.32	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.05	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	0.18	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.53	0.54	-0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNCL vs. VFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is comparable to the VFH Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCL and VFH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNCL	VFH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14	0.14	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.48	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.55	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.24	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between FNCL and VFH is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FNCL vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

FNCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than VFH's 1.61% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF	1.75%	1.45%	1.52%	1.91%	2.29%	1.75%	2.26%	2.17%	2.37%	1.60%	1.81%	2.17%
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	1.61%	1.55%	1.75%	2.08%	2.31%	1.87%	2.21%	2.17%	2.30%	1.53%	1.63%	2.00%

Drawdowns

FNCL vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCL drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL and VFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNCL	VFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.38%	-78.61%	+34.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.78%	-14.75%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.68%	-25.66%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.38%	-44.42%	+0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.97%	-11.95%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.89%	-18.62%	+11.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.98%	4.99%	-0.01%

Volatility

FNCL vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) have volatilities of 4.88% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNCL	VFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	4.85%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.74%	11.75%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.99%	19.93%	+0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.33%	19.37%	-0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.35%	22.55%	-0.20%