FNCL vs. VFH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FNCL (Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - FNCL tracks the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index while VFH tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNCL returned 13.39%/yr vs 13.46%/yr for VFH. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FNCL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.

Performance

FNCL vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCL achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than VFH's -0.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNCL having a 13.39% annualized return and VFH not far ahead at 13.46%.

FNCL

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: -0.77%
• 6M: -2.03%
• 1Y: 9.85%
• 3Y*: 20.78%
• 5Y*: 10.23%
• 10Y*: 13.39%

VFH

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: -0.69%
• 6M: -1.93%
• 1Y: 9.84%
• 3Y*: 20.85%
• 5Y*: 10.29%
• 10Y*: 13.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCL vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF	-0.77%	14.94%	30.44%	14.10%	-12.28%	34.92%	-2.19%	31.59%	-13.44%	19.99%
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	-0.69%	14.91%	30.44%	14.17%	-12.31%	35.22%	-1.96%	31.57%	-13.52%	19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCL and VFH is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	1.00

The correlation between FNCL and VFH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNCL vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNCL	VFH
Financial Services	96.9%	96.8%
Technology	2.0%	2.1%
Real Estate	0.7%	0.8%
Industrials	0.2%	0.2%
Healthcare	0.1%	0.1%
Communication Services	0.0%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNCL vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCL

FNCL Risk / Return Rank: 18
FNCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FNCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FNCL Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FNCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FNCL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

VFH

VFH Risk / Return Rank: 18
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 18
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCL vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNCL	VFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	0.66	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	0.99	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.12	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	0.67	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.74	1.74	0.00

FNCL vs. VFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the VFH Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCL and VFH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNCL vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCL drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL and VFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNCL	VFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.38%	-78.61%	+34.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.78%	-14.75%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.29%	-17.30%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.68%	-25.66%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.38%	-44.42%	+0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-3.71%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.90%	-18.51%	+11.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.68%	5.67%	+0.01%

Volatility

FNCL vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNCL	VFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.21%	4.19%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.35%	11.41%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.96%	14.98%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.21%	19.26%	-0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.36%	22.56%	-0.20%

FNCL vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNCL vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

FNCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than VFH's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF	1.65%	1.45%	1.52%	1.91%	2.29%	1.75%	2.26%	2.17%	2.37%	1.60%	1.81%	2.17%
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	1.47%	1.55%	1.75%	2.08%	2.31%	1.87%	2.21%	2.17%	2.30%	1.53%	1.63%	2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNCL and VFH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FNCL and VFH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNCL or VFH?

FNCL has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to VFH (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNCL dropped -44.38% vs VFH's -78.61%.

Which ETF is better, FNCL or VFH?

On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 13.46% vs 13.39% for FNCL. On fees, FNCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNCL or VFH?

Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 13.46% return vs 13.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNCL or VFH?

FNCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNCL or VFH?

FNCL has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.47% for VFH.

What is the main difference between FNCL and VFH?

FNCL tracks MSCI USA IMI Financials Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FNCL and 0.09% for VFH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.