FNCL vs. KBE
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE).
FNCL and KBE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNCL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. KBE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Banks Select Industry Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2005. Both FNCL and KBE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNCL or KBE.
Performance
FNCL vs. KBE - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNCL achieves a 34.22% return, which is significantly higher than KBE's 32.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FNCL has outperformed KBE with an annualized return of 11.96%, while KBE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.
FNCL
34.22%
5.19%
20.45%
46.39%
13.07%
11.96%
KBE
32.16%
7.14%
27.23%
53.57%
8.54%
8.51%
Key characteristics
| FNCL | KBE | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.22 | 2.00 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.57 | 3.00 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.59 | 1.37 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.57 | 1.70 |
| Martin Ratio | 22.88 | 12.16 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.05% | 4.39% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.59% | 26.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.38% | -83.15% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.52% | -2.65% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNCL vs. KBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than KBE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FNCL and KBE is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNCL vs. KBE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNCL vs. KBE - Dividend Comparison
FNCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than KBE's 2.20% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 1.41% | 1.91% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.37% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 2.17% | 1.77% | 0.43% |
KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 2.20% | 2.78% | 2.99% | 2.16% | 2.44% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.35% | 1.39% | 1.69% | 1.59% | 1.37% |
Drawdowns
FNCL vs. KBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNCL drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum KBE drawdown of -83.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL and KBE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNCL vs. KBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) is 7.57%, while SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that FNCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.