IYF vs. BPAY
IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) and BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. IYF is passively managed, while BPAY is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IYF returned 20.58%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for BPAY. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYF charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BPAY.
Performance
IYF vs. BPAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYF achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly higher than BPAY's -12.44% return.
IYF
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
BPAY
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- -12.44%
- 6M
- -14.32%
- 1Y
- -10.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYF vs. BPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | -5.20% | 18.25% | 31.30% | 15.32% | -4.19% |
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | -12.44% | 8.54% | 17.28% | 13.19% | -16.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYF and BPAY is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IYF and BPAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
IYF vs. BPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYF
BPAY
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IYF
BPAY
Real Estate
IYF
BPAY
Technology
IYF
BPAY
Basic Materials
IYF
-
BPAY
-
Communication Services
IYF
-
BPAY
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYF
-
BPAY
Consumer Defensive
IYF
-
BPAY
-
Energy
IYF
-
BPAY
-
Healthcare
IYF
-
BPAY
-
Industrials
IYF
-
BPAY
Utilities
IYF
-
BPAY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYF vs. BPAY — Risk / Return Rank
IYF
BPAY
IYF vs. BPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYF | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.95 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | -0.32 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | -0.64 | +1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYF | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | -0.42 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.06 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
IYF vs. BPAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYF drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, which is greater than BPAY's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYF and BPAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYF | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.09% | -33.62% | -45.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -33.62% | +19.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -33.62% | +17.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.10% | -26.03% | +17.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.61% | -10.54% | -7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | 16.98% | -11.92% |
Volatility
IYF vs. BPAY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) is 3.41%, while BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that IYF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYF | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 6.91% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 18.71% | -7.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 26.01% | -11.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 24.35% | -5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 24.35% | -3.46% |
IYF vs. BPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYF has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than BPAY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYF vs. BPAY - Dividend Comparison
IYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than BPAY's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | 7.41% | 6.49% | 0.48% | 1.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 1.57% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.64% | 1.90% | 1.46% | 1.67% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYF and BPAY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BPAY has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to IYF (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYF dropped -79.09% vs BPAY's -33.62%.
On 3-year performance, IYF leads with 20.58% vs 8.49% for BPAY. On fees, IYF is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYF has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IYF has performed better with a 20.58% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYF is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.
BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 1.57% for IYF.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYF and 0.70% for BPAY.
IYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYF and BPAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer