PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYF vs. BBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYF vs. BBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYF achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than BBP's 5.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IYF has outperformed BBP with an annualized return of 12.56%, while BBP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.


IYF

1D
-1.13%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
-5.20%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
12.56%

BBP

1D
1.18%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
5.80%
6M
7.91%
1Y
45.02%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYF vs. BBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
-5.20%18.25%31.30%15.32%-11.33%31.60%-1.00%31.86%-9.39%19.58%
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
5.80%33.15%3.32%17.88%0.85%-8.17%22.24%24.73%-13.95%24.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IYF and BBP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2014

0.44

IYF vs. BBP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYF
BBP

Financial Services

99.0%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

100.0%

Industrials

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IYF
99.0%
BBP

-

Real Estate

IYF
0.7%
BBP

-

Technology

IYF
0.3%
BBP

-

Basic Materials

IYF

-

BBP

-

Communication Services

IYF

-

BBP

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYF

-

BBP

-

Consumer Defensive

IYF

-

BBP

-

Energy

IYF

-

BBP

-

Healthcare

IYF

-

BBP
100.0%

Industrials

IYF

-

BBP

-

Utilities

IYF

-

BBP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYF vs. BBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYF
IYF Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
IYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYF Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYF Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BBP
BBP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBP Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYF vs. BBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYFBBPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.42

1.91

-1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.65

2.73

-2.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.32

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

4.87

-4.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.18

15.32

-14.14

IYF vs. BBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYF Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the BBP Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYF and BBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYFBBPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

1.91

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.40

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.42

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.39

-0.17

Drawdowns

IYF vs. BBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYF drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, which is greater than BBP's maximum drawdown of -44.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYF and BBP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYFBBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.09%

-44.32%

-34.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-9.28%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

-26.09%

+9.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

-38.28%

+13.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.57%

-44.32%

+1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.10%

-6.47%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.61%

-12.02%

-5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.06%

2.95%

+2.11%

Volatility

IYF vs. BBP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) is 3.41%, while Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that IYF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYFBBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

7.61%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

18.43%

-7.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

23.76%

-9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

26.35%

-7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.89%

27.40%

-6.51%

IYF vs. BBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYF has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than BBP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYF vs. BBP - Dividend Comparison

IYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while BBP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.00%1.29%
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
1.57%1.32%1.29%1.67%1.86%1.27%1.72%1.64%1.90%1.46%1.67%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYF and BBP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBP has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to IYF (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYF dropped -79.09% vs BBP's -44.32%.

On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 12.56% vs 11.61% for BBP. On fees, IYF is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYF has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 12.56% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYF is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBP.

IYF has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.00% for BBP.

IYF is categorized as Financials Equities, while BBP is Health & Biotech Equities. IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, while BBP tracks LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYF and 0.79% for BBP.

BBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYF and BBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer