IYC vs. MILN
IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) and MILN (Global X Millennial Consumer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYC is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while MILN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Indxx Millennials Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYC returned 11.80%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for MILN. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IYC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MILN.
Performance
IYC vs. MILN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly higher than MILN's -9.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYC having a 11.80% annualized return and MILN not far behind at 11.48%.
IYC
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- -3.42%
- 6M
- -4.50%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
MILN
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- -9.43%
- 6M
- -9.60%
- 1Y
- -9.15%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
IYC vs. MILN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -3.42% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 34.03% | -31.78% | 19.65% | 24.58% | 27.36% | 1.76% | 19.87% |
MILN Global X Millennial Consumer ETF | -9.43% | 4.63% | 27.11% | 36.27% | -38.55% | 13.99% | 44.77% | 32.24% | 2.57% | 24.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYC and MILN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IYC and MILN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
IYC vs. MILN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYC
MILN
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYC
MILN
Communication Services
IYC
MILN
Consumer Defensive
IYC
MILN
Technology
IYC
MILN
Industrials
IYC
MILN
Energy
IYC
MILN
-
Basic Materials
IYC
-
MILN
-
Financial Services
IYC
-
MILN
Healthcare
IYC
-
MILN
Real Estate
IYC
-
MILN
Utilities
IYC
-
MILN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYC vs. MILN — Risk / Return Rank
IYC
MILN
IYC vs. MILN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYC | MILN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.93 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | -0.41 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | -0.87 | +1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYC vs. MILN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, which is greater than MILN's maximum drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and MILN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYC | MILN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.10% | -44.40% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -22.32% | +10.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.62% | -23.48% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.90% | -44.40% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.90% | -44.40% | +8.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | -16.02% | +8.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -10.69% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 10.49% | -6.32% |
Volatility
IYC vs. MILN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 4.93%, while Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MILN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYC | MILN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 5.63% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 13.62% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 17.42% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 22.71% | -1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 22.04% | -2.13% |
IYC vs. MILN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MILN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYC vs. MILN - Dividend Comparison
IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than MILN's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
MILN Global X Millennial Consumer ETF | 0.28% | 0.25% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.24% | 0.15% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.43% | 0.89% | 0.32% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYC and MILN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MILN has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to IYC (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs MILN's -44.40%.
On 10-year performance, IYC leads with 11.80% vs 11.48% for MILN. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYC has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MILN.
IYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.28% for MILN.
IYC is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while MILN is Large Cap Growth Equities. IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while MILN tracks Indxx Millennials Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.50% for MILN.
IYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYC and MILN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer