PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. MILN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYC vs. MILN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly higher than MILN's -9.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYC having a 11.80% annualized return and MILN not far behind at 11.48%.


IYC

1D
-0.27%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
-3.42%
6M
-4.50%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
11.80%

MILN

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
-9.43%
6M
-9.60%
1Y
-9.15%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYC vs. MILN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-3.42%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%
MILN
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
-9.43%4.63%27.11%36.27%-38.55%13.99%44.77%32.24%2.57%24.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and MILN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2016

0.88

The correlation between IYC and MILN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYC vs. MILN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYC
MILN

Consumer Cyclical

67.8%
51.5%

Communication Services

13.4%
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

11.2%
6.3%

Technology

3.8%
13.9%

Industrials

3.6%
0.4%

Energy

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYC
67.8%
MILN
51.5%

Communication Services

IYC
13.4%
MILN
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

IYC
11.2%
MILN
6.3%

Technology

IYC
3.8%
MILN
13.9%

Industrials

IYC
3.6%
MILN
0.4%

Energy

IYC
0.1%
MILN

-

Basic Materials

IYC

-

MILN

-

Financial Services

IYC

-

MILN
4.8%

Healthcare

IYC

-

MILN
0.8%

Real Estate

IYC

-

MILN
6.0%

Utilities

IYC

-

MILN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. MILN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MILN
MILN Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MILN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MILN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MILN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MILN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MILN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYC vs. MILN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYCMILNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.93

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

-0.41

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

-0.87

+1.49

IYC vs. MILN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the MILN Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and MILN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYC vs. MILN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, which is greater than MILN's maximum drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and MILN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCMILNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-44.40%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-22.32%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-23.48%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

-44.40%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-44.40%

+8.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.07%

-16.02%

+8.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-10.69%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

10.49%

-6.32%

Volatility

IYC vs. MILN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 4.93%, while Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MILN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYCMILNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

5.63%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

13.62%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

17.42%

-2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

22.71%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

22.04%

-2.13%

IYC vs. MILN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MILN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYC vs. MILN - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than MILN's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.52%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
MILN
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
0.28%0.25%0.22%0.33%0.24%0.15%0.21%0.43%0.43%0.89%0.32%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYC and MILN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MILN has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to IYC (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs MILN's -44.40%.

On 10-year performance, IYC leads with 11.80% vs 11.48% for MILN. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYC has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MILN.

IYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.28% for MILN.

IYC is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while MILN is Large Cap Growth Equities. IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while MILN tracks Indxx Millennials Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.50% for MILN.

IYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYC and MILN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer