PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IYC vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IYC vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-5.90%7.85%28.48%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.62%-6.41%99.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -5.90% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.62% return.


IYC

1D
2.72%
1M
-5.94%
YTD
-5.90%
6M
-7.30%
1Y
10.29%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
11.03%

IBIT

1D
1.96%
1M
3.31%
YTD
-22.62%
6M
-40.89%
1Y
-17.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IYC vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYC vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYCIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

-0.40

+0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

-0.29

+1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.97

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

-0.39

+1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.85

-0.83

+3.68

IYC vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYCIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

-0.40

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.35

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and IBIT is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IYC vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.53%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IYC vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-49.36%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-49.36%

+36.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.46%

-46.11%

+36.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-14.13%

+4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

23.09%

-19.35%

Volatility

IYC vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 5.84%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IYCIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

12.99%

-7.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

36.75%

-25.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

45.42%

-25.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.68%

51.26%

-30.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

51.26%

-31.40%