IXUS vs. XLK
IXUS (iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXUS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net), while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXUS returned 10.05%/yr vs 25.67%/yr for XLK. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
IXUS vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXUS achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 33.14% return. Over the past 10 years, IXUS has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 10.05%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.67% annualized return.
IXUS
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 17.08%
- 1Y
- 34.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
XLK
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- 7.19%
- YTD
- 33.14%
- 6M
- 32.76%
- 1Y
- 60.08%
- 3Y*
- 31.17%
- 5Y*
- 22.86%
- 10Y*
- 25.67%
IXUS vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 16.05% | 32.40% | 5.19% | 15.83% | -16.47% | 8.86% | 10.80% | 21.71% | -14.41% | 28.12% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 33.14% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXUS and XLK is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IXUS and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
IXUS vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXUS
XLK
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
IXUS
XLK
Financial Services
IXUS
XLK
-
Industrials
IXUS
XLK
Healthcare
IXUS
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
IXUS
XLK
-
Basic Materials
IXUS
XLK
-
Energy
IXUS
XLK
Communication Services
IXUS
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
IXUS
XLK
-
Utilities
IXUS
XLK
-
Real Estate
IXUS
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXUS vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
IXUS
XLK
IXUS vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXUS | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.42 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 3.75 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | 12.01 | -0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXUS vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXUS | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.22% | -82.05% | +45.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -15.92% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.75% | -25.66% | +11.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.03% | -33.56% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.22% | -33.56% | -2.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.42% | +3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -34.91% | +27.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 4.96% | -2.02% |
Volatility
IXUS vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) is 6.60%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that IXUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXUS | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 11.79% | -5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.32% | 19.39% | -5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 23.08% | -6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 25.30% | -8.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 24.70% | -7.57% |
IXUS vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IXUS vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than XLK's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 2.89% | 3.24% | 3.33% | 3.13% | 2.48% | 3.12% | 1.85% | 3.09% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 2.58% | 2.81% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXUS and XLK have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to IXUS (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.67% vs 10.05% for IXUS. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IXUS has been the lower-risk option at 6.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.67% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLK.
IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.40% for XLK.
IXUS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net), while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IXUS and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXUS and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer