IXUS vs. UMMA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IXUS (iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. IXUS is passively managed, while UMMA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IXUS returned 19.01%/yr vs 21.92%/yr for UMMA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IXUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.

Performance

IXUS vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXUS achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 29.52% return.

IXUS

• 1D: -3.08%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 12.52%
• 1Y: 29.41%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

UMMA

• 1D: -5.07%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 29.52%
• 6M: 30.57%
• 1Y: 50.76%
• 3Y*: 21.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXUS vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF	12.74%	32.40%	5.19%	15.83%	-15.99%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	29.52%	26.65%	4.67%	18.84%	-21.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IXUS and UMMA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2022	0.90

The correlation between IXUS and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXUS vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IXUS	UMMA
Technology	30.5%	48.2%
Financial Services	23.8%	0.0%
Industrials	11.3%	12.1%
Healthcare	6.5%	14.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.6%	7.3%
Basic Materials	5.0%	8.8%
Energy	4.4%	2.4%
Communication Services	4.2%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	5.0%
Utilities	1.9%	-
Real Estate	0.2%	0.4%

Return for Risk

IXUS vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUS

IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 55
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 56
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 58

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 70
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUS vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IXUS	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.24	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.88	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.40	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	3.42	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.00	13.07	-3.07

IXUS vs. UMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the UMMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUS and UMMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IXUS vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, which is greater than UMMA's maximum drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and UMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	IXUS	UMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.22%	-34.17%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.36%	-14.93%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.75%	-18.73%	+4.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.08%	-5.07%	+1.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.48%	-9.73%	+2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	3.89%	-0.94%

Volatility

IXUS vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) is 7.22%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 12.08%. This indicates that IXUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IXUS	UMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.22%	12.08%	-4.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.64%	20.30%	-5.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.56%	22.74%	-6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.45%	21.08%	-4.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	21.08%	-4.11%

IXUS vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

IXUS vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than UMMA's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF	2.98%	3.24%	3.33%	3.13%	2.48%	3.12%	1.85%	3.09%	3.00%	2.41%	2.58%	2.81%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.95%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IXUS and UMMA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, IXUS and UMMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IXUS or UMMA?

UMMA has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to IXUS (7.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs UMMA's -34.17%.

Which ETF is better, IXUS or UMMA?

On 3-year performance, UMMA leads with 21.92% vs 19.01% for IXUS. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IXUS has been the lower-risk option at 7.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IXUS or UMMA?

Over the 3-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 21.92% return vs 19.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IXUS or UMMA?

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IXUS or UMMA?

IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.95% for UMMA.

What is the main difference between IXUS and UMMA?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IXUS and 0.65% for UMMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.