PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXUS vs. DFAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXUS vs. DFAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXUS achieves a 14.51% return, which is significantly higher than DFAR's 11.46% return.


IXUS

1D
-1.01%
1M
4.91%
YTD
14.51%
6M
17.16%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
9.78%

DFAR

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
11.46%
6M
10.41%
1Y
11.45%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXUS vs. DFAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
14.51%32.40%5.19%15.83%-10.38%
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
11.46%1.31%5.25%11.04%-14.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IXUS and DFAR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.55

The correlation between IXUS and DFAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXUS vs. DFAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXUS
DFAR

Financial Services

22.4%
0.0%

Technology

18.0%

-

Industrials

15.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%

-

Basic Materials

7.6%

-

Healthcare

7.1%

-

Energy

5.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%

-

Communication Services

4.8%

-

Utilities

3.2%

-

Real Estate

2.5%
99.8%

Financial Services

IXUS
22.4%
DFAR
0.0%

Technology

IXUS
18.0%
DFAR

-

Industrials

IXUS
15.9%
DFAR

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXUS
8.3%
DFAR

-

Basic Materials

IXUS
7.6%
DFAR

-

Healthcare

IXUS
7.1%
DFAR

-

Energy

IXUS
5.2%
DFAR

-

Consumer Defensive

IXUS
5.1%
DFAR

-

Communication Services

IXUS
4.8%
DFAR

-

Utilities

IXUS
3.2%
DFAR

-

Real Estate

IXUS
2.5%
DFAR
99.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXUS vs. DFAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAR
DFAR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DFAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAR Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAR Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUS vs. DFAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXUSDFARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.16

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

1.36

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

4.29

+6.84

IXUS vs. DFAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the DFAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUS and DFAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXUSDFARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

0.88

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.15

+0.34

Drawdowns

IXUS vs. DFAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, which is greater than DFAR's maximum drawdown of -32.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and DFAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXUSDFARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.22%

-32.27%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-8.43%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-17.64%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-3.01%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-14.22%

+6.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.67%

+0.23%

Volatility

IXUS vs. DFAR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) at 3.71%. This indicates that IXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXUSDFARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

3.71%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

9.40%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

13.10%

+2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

19.13%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

19.13%

-2.06%

IXUS vs. DFAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IXUS vs. DFAR - Dividend Comparison

IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than DFAR's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
2.77%2.97%2.89%3.06%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
2.83%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXUS and DFAR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXUS has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to DFAR (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs DFAR's -32.27%.

On 3-year performance, IXUS leads with 19.44% vs 9.64% for DFAR. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IXUS has performed better with a 19.44% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DFAR.

IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.77% for DFAR.

IXUS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DFAR is REIT. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IXUS and 0.19% for DFAR.

IXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXUS and DFAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer