DFAR vs. FREL
DFAR (Dimensional US Real Estate ETF) and FREL (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF) are both REIT funds. DFAR is actively managed, while FREL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAR returned 9.64%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for FREL. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAR charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FREL.
Performance
DFAR vs. FREL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAR achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly higher than FREL's 7.59% return.
DFAR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 11.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FREL
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- 5.67%
DFAR vs. FREL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 11.46% | 1.31% | 5.25% | 11.04% | -14.30% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 7.59% | 3.09% | 5.05% | 11.74% | -15.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAR and FREL is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.99 |
The correlation between DFAR and FREL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAR vs. FREL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAR
FREL
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
DFAR
FREL
Financial Services
DFAR
FREL
Basic Materials
DFAR
-
FREL
Communication Services
DFAR
-
FREL
Consumer Cyclical
DFAR
-
FREL
-
Consumer Defensive
DFAR
-
FREL
-
Energy
DFAR
-
FREL
Healthcare
DFAR
-
FREL
-
Industrials
DFAR
-
FREL
-
Technology
DFAR
-
FREL
Utilities
DFAR
-
FREL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAR vs. FREL — Risk / Return Rank
DFAR
FREL
DFAR vs. FREL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAR | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.14 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.17 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 3.67 | +0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAR | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.75 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.25 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
DFAR vs. FREL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAR drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, smaller than the maximum FREL drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAR and FREL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAR | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.27% | -42.61% | +10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -8.45% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -17.54% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -3.93% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.22% | -9.95% | -4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.68% | -0.01% |
Volatility
DFAR vs. FREL - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAR | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 3.75% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 9.27% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 13.17% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 18.84% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 20.67% | -1.54% |
DFAR vs. FREL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FREL's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFAR vs. FREL - Dividend Comparison
DFAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than FREL's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 2.77% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 3.06% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 3.34% | 3.59% | 3.48% | 3.73% | 3.57% | 2.34% | 3.77% | 3.32% | 5.54% | 3.27% | 4.01% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, DFAR and FREL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FREL has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to DFAR (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAR dropped -32.27% vs FREL's -42.61%.
On 3-year performance, DFAR leads with 9.64% vs 9.05% for FREL. On fees, FREL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAR has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FREL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DFAR.
FREL has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 2.77% for DFAR.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DFAR and 0.08% for FREL.
DFAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAR and FREL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer