PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXUS vs. AEPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXUS vs. AEPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXUS achieves a 14.51% return, which is significantly higher than AEPGX's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IXUS has outperformed AEPGX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while AEPGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.68% annualized return.


IXUS

1D
-1.01%
1M
4.91%
YTD
14.51%
6M
17.16%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
9.78%

AEPGX

1D
0.53%
1M
6.73%
YTD
12.18%
6M
14.87%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
8.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXUS vs. AEPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
14.51%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%
AEPGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A
12.18%28.88%2.63%15.65%-23.06%-1.64%24.80%26.94%-15.21%30.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IXUS and AEPGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.92

The correlation between IXUS and AEPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXUS vs. AEPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

AEPGX
AEPGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AEPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AEPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUS vs. AEPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXUSAEPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.27

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

8.57

+2.56

IXUS vs. AEPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the AEPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUS and AEPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXUSAEPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.86

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.25

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.51

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.52

-0.03

Drawdowns

IXUS vs. AEPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, smaller than the maximum AEPGX drawdown of -53.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and AEPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXUSAEPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.22%

-53.98%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-12.56%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-15.75%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.04%

-38.22%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

-38.50%

+2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

0.00%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-11.47%

+3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.33%

-0.43%

Volatility

IXUS vs. AEPGX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) have volatilities of 5.64% and 5.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXUSAEPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

5.41%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

12.92%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

15.38%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

16.74%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

16.95%

+0.12%

IXUS vs. AEPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AEPGX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXUS vs. AEPGX - Dividend Comparison

IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than AEPGX's 12.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEPGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A
12.21%13.69%4.56%3.57%1.72%5.15%0.17%2.79%6.33%4.66%1.24%3.05%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
2.83%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IXUS and AEPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IXUS has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to AEPGX (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs AEPGX's -53.98%.

IXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXUS and AEPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer