PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEPGX vs. AMRMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEPGX vs. AMRMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) and American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A (AMRMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEPGX achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than AMRMX's 6.00% return. Over the past 10 years, AEPGX has underperformed AMRMX with an annualized return of 8.62%, while AMRMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.15% annualized return.


AEPGX

1D
0.25%
1M
6.35%
YTD
11.58%
6M
15.16%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
8.62%

AMRMX

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.77%
YTD
6.00%
6M
6.73%
1Y
17.07%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEPGX vs. AMRMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEPGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A
11.58%28.88%2.63%15.65%-23.06%-1.64%24.80%26.94%-15.21%30.74%
AMRMX
American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A
6.00%16.08%14.93%9.43%-4.49%24.99%4.52%21.53%-2.25%17.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AEPGX and AMRMX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.63

The correlation between AEPGX and AMRMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEPGX vs. AMRMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEPGX
AEPGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AEPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AEPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

AMRMX
AMRMX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AMRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AMRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEPGX vs. AMRMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) and American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A (AMRMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEPGXAMRMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.86

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.68

2.60

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.25

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.57

9.06

-0.49

AEPGX vs. AMRMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the AMRMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEPGX and AMRMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEPGXAMRMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.86

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.82

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.79

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.71

-0.19

Drawdowns

AEPGX vs. AMRMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEPGX drawdown since its inception was -53.98%, which is greater than AMRMX's maximum drawdown of -48.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEPGX and AMRMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEPGXAMRMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.98%

-48.75%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-7.92%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.75%

-12.96%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.22%

-15.31%

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

-29.81%

-8.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.48%

-4.96%

-6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

1.97%

+1.36%

Volatility

AEPGX vs. AMRMX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A (AEPGX) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A (AMRMX) at 2.28%. This indicates that AEPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMRMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEPGXAMRMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

2.28%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

7.34%

+5.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

9.48%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

12.50%

+4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

14.12%

+2.83%

AEPGX vs. AMRMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEPGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than AMRMX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

AEPGX vs. AMRMX - Dividend Comparison

AEPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.27%, more than AMRMX's 7.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEPGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A
12.27%13.69%4.56%3.57%1.72%5.15%0.17%2.79%6.33%4.66%1.24%3.05%
AMRMX
American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A
7.14%7.55%6.27%3.75%4.88%4.65%1.74%4.60%6.44%5.96%4.83%6.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


AEPGX and AMRMX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEPGX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to AMRMX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEPGX dropped -53.98% vs AMRMX's -48.75%.

AEPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEPGX and AMRMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer