PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXP vs. IUSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXP vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXP achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 14.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IXP has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 9.33%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return.


IXP

1D
-1.03%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.33%
1Y
18.24%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
9.33%

IUSG

1D
-0.89%
1M
7.35%
YTD
14.08%
6M
13.91%
1Y
33.89%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
15.69%
10Y*
17.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXP vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXP
iShares Global Comm Services ETF
0.11%29.27%31.33%38.80%-33.40%12.77%22.16%25.23%-13.67%6.65%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
14.08%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IXP and IUSG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2001

0.72

The correlation between IXP and IUSG shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXP vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXP
IUSG

Communication Services

97.7%
17.1%

Technology

2.0%
48.0%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
9.3%

Basic Materials

-

0.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

0.2%

Financial Services

-

8.8%

Healthcare

-

6.2%

Industrials

-

7.5%

Utilities

-

0.5%

Communication Services

IXP
97.7%
IUSG
17.1%

Technology

IXP
2.0%
IUSG
48.0%

Real Estate

IXP
0.5%
IUSG
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IXP
0.2%
IUSG
9.3%

Basic Materials

IXP

-

IUSG
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

IXP

-

IUSG
1.0%

Energy

IXP

-

IUSG
0.2%

Financial Services

IXP

-

IUSG
8.8%

Healthcare

IXP

-

IUSG
6.2%

Industrials

IXP

-

IUSG
7.5%

Utilities

IXP

-

IUSG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXP vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXP
IXP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXP Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXP vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXPIUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.61

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.21

11.09

-5.88

IXP vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXP Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXP and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXPIUSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.17

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.76

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.88

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.38

-0.04

Drawdowns

IXP vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXP drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXP and IUSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXPIUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-63.41%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-13.07%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-22.28%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.30%

-32.21%

-12.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.30%

-32.35%

-11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-0.98%

-3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.92%

-21.44%

+9.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

3.06%

+0.45%

Volatility

IXP vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) is 3.92%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that IXP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXPIUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

4.23%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

12.23%

-1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

15.72%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

20.87%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

20.40%

-1.88%

IXP vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXP has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXP vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

IXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than IUSG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.47%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%
IXP
iShares Global Comm Services ETF
2.98%2.98%1.35%1.24%0.62%1.80%0.95%2.18%4.32%3.41%4.02%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXP and IUSG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUSG has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to IXP (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXP dropped -50.11% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.88% vs 9.33% for IXP. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IXP has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IXP.

IXP has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.47% for IUSG.

IXP tracks S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped, while IUSG tracks Russell 3000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IXP and 0.04% for IUSG.

IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXP and IUSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer