PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXN vs. PXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXN vs. PXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 33.08% return, which is significantly higher than PXF's 18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IXN has outperformed PXF with an annualized return of 25.03%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.


IXN

1D
0.42%
1M
3.37%
YTD
33.08%
6M
35.17%
1Y
62.93%
3Y*
32.38%
5Y*
21.51%
10Y*
25.03%

PXF

1D
0.34%
1M
0.69%
YTD
18.79%
6M
20.98%
1Y
41.20%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXN vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
33.08%25.25%24.84%52.98%-29.86%29.58%43.62%47.88%-5.44%41.23%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
18.79%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between IXN and PXF is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2007

0.69

The correlation between IXN and PXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXN vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXN
PXF

Technology

99.2%
14.7%

Industrials

0.2%
14.6%

Energy

0.1%
9.5%

Healthcare

0.1%
6.8%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.6%

Basic Materials

-

10.1%

Communication Services

-

4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.7%

Financial Services

-

19.1%

Utilities

-

3.2%

Technology

IXN
99.2%
PXF
14.7%

Industrials

IXN
0.2%
PXF
14.6%

Energy

IXN
0.1%
PXF
9.5%

Healthcare

IXN
0.1%
PXF
6.8%

Real Estate

IXN
0.0%
PXF
1.6%

Basic Materials

IXN

-

PXF
10.1%

Communication Services

IXN

-

PXF
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IXN

-

PXF
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

IXN

-

PXF
5.7%

Financial Services

IXN

-

PXF
19.1%

Utilities

IXN

-

PXF
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXN vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXN vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IXNPXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

3.66

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.35

13.76

+0.60

IXN vs. PXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the PXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXN and PXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXN vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, smaller than the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and PXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXNPXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-64.74%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-10.91%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.55%

-14.06%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-26.82%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

-41.59%

+5.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.68%

-2.04%

-4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-15.25%

+3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

2.90%

+1.31%

Volatility

IXN vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) at 6.76%. This indicates that IXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXNPXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.01%

6.76%

+5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.45%

13.95%

+6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.03%

16.18%

+7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.19%

16.62%

+8.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.58%

18.07%

+6.51%

IXN vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXN vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison

IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than PXF's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
0.78%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.12%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXN and PXF have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXN has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to PXF (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs PXF's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 25.03% vs 12.26% for PXF. On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 25.03% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.

PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.78% for IXN.

IXN is categorized as Technology Equities, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.45% for PXF.

IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXN and PXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer