IXN vs. PXF
IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) and PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while PXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXN returned 25.03%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for PXF. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXN charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PXF.
Performance
IXN vs. PXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 33.08% return, which is significantly higher than PXF's 18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IXN has outperformed PXF with an annualized return of 25.03%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.
IXN
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 33.08%
- 6M
- 35.17%
- 1Y
- 62.93%
- 3Y*
- 32.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 25.03%
PXF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 41.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
IXN vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 33.08% | 25.25% | 24.84% | 52.98% | -29.86% | 29.58% | 43.62% | 47.88% | -5.44% | 41.23% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 18.79% | 42.51% | 4.54% | 18.46% | -9.09% | 15.93% | 2.58% | 17.50% | -14.84% | 24.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXN and PXF is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2007 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IXN and PXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IXN vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXN
PXF
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IXN
PXF
Industrials
IXN
PXF
Energy
IXN
PXF
Healthcare
IXN
PXF
Real Estate
IXN
PXF
Basic Materials
IXN
-
PXF
Communication Services
IXN
-
PXF
Consumer Cyclical
IXN
-
PXF
Consumer Defensive
IXN
-
PXF
Financial Services
IXN
-
PXF
Utilities
IXN
-
PXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXN vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank
IXN
PXF
IXN vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXN | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.39 | 3.66 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 13.76 | +0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXN vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, smaller than the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and PXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXN | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -64.74% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -10.91% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.55% | -14.06% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.30% | -26.82% | -9.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | -41.59% | +5.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.68% | -2.04% | -4.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -15.25% | +3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 2.90% | +1.31% |
Volatility
IXN vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) at 6.76%. This indicates that IXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXN | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.01% | 6.76% | +5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.45% | 13.95% | +6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 16.18% | +7.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 16.62% | +8.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 18.07% | +6.51% |
IXN vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXN vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison
IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than PXF's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.78% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXN and PXF have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXN has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to PXF (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs PXF's -64.74%.
On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 25.03% vs 12.26% for PXF. On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 25.03% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.
PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.78% for IXN.
IXN is categorized as Technology Equities, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.45% for PXF.
IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXN and PXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer