IXG vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXG is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Financials Sector Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. IXG is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, IXG returned 19.39% vs 264.10% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. IXG charges 0.46%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

IXG vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.

IXG

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 4.57%
• 6M: 6.87%
• YTD: 8.52%
• 1Y: 19.39%
• 3Y*: 24.74%
• 5Y*: 13.99%
• 10Y*: 13.11%

MSTZ

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 39.32%
• 6M: -19.19%
• YTD: -26.97%
• 1Y: 264.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXG vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF	8.52%	28.54%	3.98%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-26.97%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IXG and MSTZ is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.32

Return for Risk

IXG vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXG

IXG Risk / Return Rank: 44
IXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
IXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
IXG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
IXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
IXG Martin Ratio Rank: 44

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXG vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IXG	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.64	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.34	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.30	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	2.86	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.67	5.59	+0.08

IXG vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXG and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IXG vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IXG	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.42%	-99.38%	+20.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-84.89%	+73.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-97.51%	+97.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.67%	-94.53%	+74.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	43.41%	-40.20%

Volatility

IXG vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) is 4.00%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that IXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IXG	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	56.46%	-52.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.33%	135.20%	-123.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.94%	148.41%	-134.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	171.17%	-153.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.86%	171.17%	-151.31%

IXG vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

IXG vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF	2.19%	2.04%	2.64%	2.62%	3.71%	1.69%	2.13%	2.87%	3.14%	2.12%	2.21%	2.79%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IXG and MSTZ in my portfolio?

IXG and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IXG or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to IXG (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXG dropped -78.42% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, IXG or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 19.39% for IXG. On fees, IXG is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXG has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IXG or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 19.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IXG or MSTZ?

IXG is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IXG or MSTZ?

IXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between IXG and MSTZ?

IXG is categorized as Financials Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXG and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.