IXG vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
IXG and XLF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IXG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Financials Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2001. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both IXG and XLF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IXG or XLF.
Performance
IXG vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a 28.49% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 34.14% return. Over the past 10 years, IXG has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 8.47%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.
IXG
28.49%
2.34%
13.54%
39.41%
11.04%
8.47%
XLF
34.14%
5.03%
18.26%
45.53%
13.12%
11.94%
Key characteristics
| IXG | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.16 | 3.35 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.15 | 4.71 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.56 | 1.61 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.05 | 3.56 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.52 | 23.90 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.83% | 1.93% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.48% | 13.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -78.42% | -82.69% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.33% | -0.04% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IXG vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between IXG and XLF is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IXG vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IXG vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than XLF's 1.33% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 2.41% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.68% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.14% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.33% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.95% | 1.61% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
IXG vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IXG vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) is 4.64%, while Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that IXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.