IXG vs. GSIB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB).
IXG and GSIB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IXG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Financials Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2001. GSIB is an actively managed fund by Themes. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023.
Performance
IXG vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IXG vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | -5.62% | 28.54% | 25.69% | 2.15% |
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | -3.15% | 61.67% | 32.86% | 2.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a -5.62% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's -3.15% return.
IXG
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- -5.62%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- 13.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
GSIB
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- -3.15%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 36.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IXG vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IXG vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank
IXG
GSIB
IXG vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXG | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.79 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 2.39 | -1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.34 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 2.51 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 8.62 | -4.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXG | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.79 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 2.15 | -1.92 |
Correlation
The correlation between IXG and GSIB is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IXG vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison
IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than GSIB's 1.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 2.16% | 2.04% | 2.64% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.69% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% |
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.97% | 1.91% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IXG vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and GSIB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXG | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.42% | -17.71% | -60.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -14.59% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.13% | -9.87% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -2.06% | -17.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 4.25% | -0.81% |
Volatility
IXG vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) is 5.96%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that IXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IXG | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 7.69% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 13.05% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.12% | 20.79% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 18.39% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 18.39% | +1.76% |