IXG vs. FDIQ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ).

IXG and FDIQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IXG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Financials Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2001. FDIQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011. Both IXG and FDIQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IXG vs. FDIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IXG vs. FDIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF	-5.62%	28.54%	25.69%	14.97%	-8.97%	25.07%	-2.99%	24.60%	-16.33%	23.78%
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF	11.45%	6.32%	12.76%	-0.84%	-7.23%	36.05%	-8.95%	23.57%	-18.31%	1.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a -5.62% return, which is significantly lower than FDIQ's 11.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IXG has outperformed FDIQ with an annualized return of 11.63%, while FDIQ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.58% annualized return.

IXG

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: -4.83%
• YTD: -5.62%
• 6M: -1.42%
• 1Y: 13.11%
• 3Y*: 21.31%
• 5Y*: 11.87%
• 10Y*: 11.63%

FDIQ

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -5.59%
• YTD: 11.45%
• 6M: 14.36%
• 1Y: 25.32%
• 3Y*: 17.52%
• 5Y*: 5.11%
• 10Y*: 8.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXG vs. FDIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

IXG

iShares Global Financials ETF

FDIQ

Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF

Return for Risk

IXG vs. FDIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXG

IXG Risk / Return Rank: 43
IXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IXG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
IXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IXG Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FDIQ

FDIQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
FDIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
FDIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FDIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FDIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FDIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXG vs. FDIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IXG	FDIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	0.92	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	1.38	-0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.20	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	1.86	-0.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.96	5.45	-1.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IXG vs. FDIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXG Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the FDIQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXG and FDIQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IXG	FDIQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	0.92	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.18	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.28	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.38	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between IXG and FDIQ is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IXG vs. FDIQ - Dividend Comparison

IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than FDIQ's 2.52% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF	2.16%	2.04%	2.64%	2.62%	3.71%	1.69%	2.13%	2.87%	3.14%	2.12%	2.21%	2.79%
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF	2.52%	2.66%	2.69%	2.89%	2.51%	2.04%	2.92%	2.44%	2.45%	1.59%	1.50%	1.92%

Drawdowns

IXG vs. FDIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than FDIQ's maximum drawdown of -52.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and FDIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IXG	FDIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.42%	-52.86%	-25.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.79%	-14.15%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.20%	-42.99%	+15.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.47%	-52.86%	+9.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.13%	-7.08%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.88%	-11.64%	-8.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	4.84%	-1.40%

Volatility

IXG vs. FDIQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) have volatilities of 5.96% and 5.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IXG	FDIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.96%	5.91%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.50%	17.49%	-6.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.12%	27.55%	-9.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	28.94%	-11.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.15%	31.21%	-11.06%