IXC vs. XLY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Energy Sector Index, while XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXC returned 10.03%/yr vs 12.57%/yr for XLY. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IXC charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLY.

Performance

IXC vs. XLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 30.67% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 10.03%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.57% annualized return.

IXC

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 3.26%
• YTD: 30.67%
• 6M: 30.15%
• 1Y: 46.37%
• 3Y*: 17.70%
• 5Y*: 19.39%
• 10Y*: 10.03%

XLY

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -4.00%
• YTD: -3.17%
• 6M: -1.81%
• 1Y: 9.63%
• 3Y*: 13.63%
• 5Y*: 6.99%
• 10Y*: 12.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXC vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF	30.67%	13.98%	1.95%	3.92%	48.51%	40.88%	-31.00%	12.67%	-14.85%	5.54%
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund	-3.17%	7.37%	26.51%	39.64%	-36.27%	27.93%	29.63%	28.39%	1.58%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IXC and XLY is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2001	0.45

The correlation between IXC and XLY shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXC vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IXC	XLY
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	1.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	97.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IXC vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXC

IXC Risk / Return Rank: 82
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 80

XLY

XLY Risk / Return Rank: 18
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXC vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IXC	XLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	0.54	+1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	0.87	+2.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.10	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.82	0.65	+4.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.26	2.01	+12.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IXC vs. XLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the XLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and XLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IXC	XLY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	0.54	+1.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.30	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.57	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.42	-0.10

Drawdowns

IXC vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than XLY's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and XLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	IXC	XLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.88%	-59.05%	-8.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-14.98%	+5.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	-26.01%	+6.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.93%	-39.67%	+14.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.16%	-39.67%	-24.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.96%	-7.15%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.47%	-9.56%	-7.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	4.80%	-1.54%

Volatility

IXC vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) at 5.32%. This indicates that IXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IXC	XLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.55%	5.32%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.51%	13.22%	+2.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.79%	18.09%	+0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.52%	23.80%	-0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.85%	22.06%	+4.79%

IXC vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

IXC vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF	2.82%	3.68%	4.56%	3.45%	4.76%	3.98%	4.86%	7.00%	3.51%	3.05%	2.86%	3.77%
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund	0.77%	0.79%	0.72%	0.78%	1.00%	0.53%	0.82%	1.28%	1.34%	1.20%	1.71%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IXC and XLY in my portfolio?

IXC and XLY have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IXC or XLY?

IXC has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to XLY (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs XLY's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, IXC or XLY?

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.57% vs 10.03% for IXC. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IXC or XLY?

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IXC or XLY?

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IXC or XLY?

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.

What is the main difference between IXC and XLY?

IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXC and 0.13% for XLY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.