IWX vs. VOO
IWX (iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Value Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWX returned 11.66%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
IWX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, IWX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.66%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
IWX
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
IWX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 13.79% | 18.23% | 14.89% | 10.45% | -5.33% | 23.33% | 1.46% | 25.82% | -6.53% | 14.05% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWX and VOO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IWX and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (3 years) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWX
VOO
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
IWX
VOO
Technology
IWX
VOO
Healthcare
IWX
VOO
Industrials
IWX
VOO
Communication Services
IWX
VOO
Consumer Defensive
IWX
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
IWX
VOO
Energy
IWX
VOO
Utilities
IWX
VOO
Basic Materials
IWX
VOO
Real Estate
IWX
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
IWX
VOO
IWX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.43 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 3.16 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.76 | 14.73 | +4.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.39 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.83 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.87 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.89 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
IWX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -33.99% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -8.90% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.37% | -18.69% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | -24.52% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.76% | -33.99% | -1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.70% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -3.69% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 1.91% | -0.38% |
Volatility
IWX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 2.84% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 8.90% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.02% | 11.80% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 16.81% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 18.01% | -1.50% |
IWX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 1.48% | 1.59% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.60% | 2.66% | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.77% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWX and VOO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to IWX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 11.66% for IWX. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWX.
IWX has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
IWX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.03% for VOO.
IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWX and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer